Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BrowserStack VS PhearJS

Compare BrowserStack VS PhearJS and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

PhearJS logo PhearJS

Render any dynamic Javascript webpage to JSON with PhantomJS.
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • PhearJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-17

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

PhearJS

Website
phear.io
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

PhearJS features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    PhearJS provides an easy-to-use interface for web scraping, making it accessible to developers with varying levels of expertise.
  • JavaScript Rendering
    It can render JavaScript-heavy websites, which allows it to scrape modern sites that rely heavily on client-side scripting.
  • Proxy Support
    PhearJS supports the use of proxies, which can help in bypassing rate limits and accessing geo-restricted content.
  • Customizable
    The platform allows for customization in the scraping process, offering flexibility to users in handling various web scraping requirements.

Possible disadvantages of PhearJS

  • Limited Control
    While PhearJS is easy to use, the abstraction may limit control over some advanced settings compared to more code-intensive solutions.
  • Dependency on Phear.io
    Relying on a third-party service means users are dependent on the availability and reliability of Phear.io’s infrastructure.
  • Potential Cost
    Depending on usage, the cost of using PhearJS can add up, especially for large-scale scraping operations.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although it is generally easy to use, mastering advanced features may require time and experience.

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

PhearJS videos

No PhearJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and PhearJS)

BrowserStack

PhearJS

Website Testing
97 97%
Website Testing
3% 3
Browser Testing
93 93%
Browser Testing
7% 7
Automated Testing
93 93%
Automated Testing
7% 7
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and PhearJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and PhearJS

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

PhearJS Reviews

We have no reviews of PhearJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

PhearJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PhearJS yet. Tracking of PhearJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and PhearJS, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Screenster - 10x faster UI testing without a line of code.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Loading...