Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserStack VS Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

Compare BrowserStack VS Google Stackdriver Error Reporting and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting logo Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

Aggregates and displays errors produced by cloud services
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • Google Stackdriver Error Reporting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting features and specs

  • Automatic Error Grouping
    Google Stackdriver Error Reporting automatically groups similar errors to provide a clear overview of individual issues. This helps in quickly identifying recurring problems and reduces noise in the error logs.
  • Real-time Error Detection
    Errors are detected and logged in real-time, allowing for immediate identification and analysis of issues. This facilitates quick response and minimizes potential downtime.
  • Integrated Alerting
    The tool integrates with Stackdriver's alerting features, enabling teams to set up alerts based on error metrics. This ensures that teams are promptly notified about critical issues.
  • User-friendly Interface
    Stackdriver Error Reporting provides a clean and intuitive interface, making it easier for teams to navigate and analyze error data, which improves productivity and reduces the learning curve.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The service offers detailed error reports, including information like timestamps, counts, and stack traces, which aids developers in diagnosing and fixing the root cause of errors effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

  • Limited to Google Cloud Environment
    Stackdriver Error Reporting is primarily designed for Google Cloud Platform, potentially limiting its integration with other cloud providers or hybrid cloud environments without additional setup.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration might be complex for users unfamiliar with Google Cloud services. This might require additional time and resources to properly integrate the tool with existing systems.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Teams not previously using Google's cloud ecosystem might face a learning curve to fully utilize the features and capabilities of Stackdriver Error Reporting.
  • Cost Considerations
    While there is a free tier, high-volume applications might incur additional costs for using Stackdriver services, which could be a concern for budget-conscious teams.
  • Integration Limitations
    Some users may find limitations in integrating with third-party tools or services outside of the Google Cloud ecosystem, which could hinder broader implementation strategies.

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting videos

No Google Stackdriver Error Reporting videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Uptime Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Hosted Status Pages
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Stackdriver Error Reporting yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack should be more popular than Google Stackdriver Error Reporting. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting mentions (2)

  • Newb Question: Website Performance & UX Testing
    Do you have any error reporting? Something like Sentry or Google's error reporting. Direct customer feedback can be great, but it often doesn't paint the full picture and doesn't give you technical details that help narrow down the issue. At the very least, you should be asking your customers who are providing feedback to tell you which browser and operating system they are using—a lot of the time this is enough... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Firebase Functions Cron monitoring?
    Yup use Cloud Console Error Reporting to get an email blast about all errors in the project. Https://cloud.google.com/error-reporting. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Akamai Prolexic Routed - Prolexic solutions provide fully managed DDoS protection for your applications, data centers, and network infrastructure

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Cofense - Cofense provides comprehensive phishing defense services to protect your data, reputation, and business.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Crisp Status Page - Monitor servers and let users know if something goes down.