Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Browsershots VS W3C Markup Validation Service

Compare Browsershots VS W3C Markup Validation Service and see what are their differences

happySEO
Create ai humanized SEO content tailored for ecommerce and small businesses with HappySEO tools. From ai writer to keyword research and analyze tools. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Browsershots logo Browsershots

Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.

W3C Markup Validation Service logo W3C Markup Validation Service

Validates HTML markup of web pages, one at a time.
  • Browsershots Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15
  • W3C Markup Validation Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-30

Browsershots features and specs

  • Wide Browser Coverage
    Browsershots supports a large variety of browsers across different operating systems, making it easier for developers to see how their website looks in multiple scenarios.
  • Free to Use
    The service offers a free version which allows users to test their websites in numerous browsers without any cost.
  • Screenshot Capability
    It provides screenshots of how websites are rendered in different browsers, enabling developers to quickly identify rendering issues.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, Browsershots doesn't require any software installation, making it easily accessible from any machine with an internet connection.

Possible disadvantages of Browsershots

  • Limited Interactivity
    Being a screenshot service, it doesn't support interactive testing, such as click events or navigation within the website.
  • Queue Times
    During peak times, there can be significant delays in getting screenshots due to the queuing system, especially for free users.
  • Outdated Browsers
    Some of the browsers offered for testing are outdated, which may not be useful for modern web development needs.
  • No Real-time Testing
    The service does not offer real-time testing capabilities, which means developers cannot debug issues immediately as they would in a local development environment.

W3C Markup Validation Service features and specs

  • Standards Compliance
    The W3C Markup Validation Service ensures that your web pages conform to established web standards, helping to improve web interoperability and accessibility.
  • Error Identification
    The service identifies errors and warnings in your HTML and XHTML documents, making it easier to debug and fix these issues to improve code quality.
  • Improved Compatibility
    By validating your markup, you can better ensure that your web pages are compatible with various browsers and devices, providing a more consistent user experience.
  • Free of Charge
    The validation service is provided by W3C at no cost, making it an accessible tool for developers of all levels to enhance their web projects.
  • Educational Tool
    For beginners in web development, the W3C Validator can serve as an educational resource by highlighting common mistakes and promoting best practices in coding.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Markup Validation Service

  • Limited to Syntax
    The validator primarily checks for syntax errors and does not assess other vital web development aspects such as design or functionality.
  • Outdated Standards
    The tool relies on W3C's standards, which can sometimes lag behind real-world usage and popular web development trends, potentially limiting its relevance.
  • Overly Strict
    The validator can be overly strict, flagging non-critical issues that may not impact user experience but are still considered 'errors' by the tool.
  • Misinterpretation of Results
    Less experienced developers might misinterpret the validator's results, focusing too much on achieving perfect validation without understanding the real impact on usability.
  • Lack of Support for Modern Frameworks
    As a markup validator, it might not fully support or correctly evaluate modern JavaScript frameworks that generate markup dynamically.

Browsershots videos

+ Add

Browsershots.org behind the scenes

W3C Markup Validation Service videos

+ Add

A Walkthrough the W3C Markup Validation Service

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Browsershots and W3C Markup Validation Service)

Browsershots

W3C Markup Validation Service

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
SEO
0 0%
SEO
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
SEO Tools
0 0%
SEO Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Browsershots and W3C Markup Validation Service. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, W3C Markup Validation Service seems to be a lot more popular than Browsershots. While we know about 98 links to W3C Markup Validation Service, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Browsershots. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Browsershots mentions (2)

W3C Markup Validation Service mentions (98)

  • HTML Validation
    How to use HTML Validation service 👇 Step 1: Access the HTML validator ● Open the HTML validator in your web browser i.e go to https://validator.w3.org/. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • WebKit Fix: Quirk News.Y Combinator to Skip TextAutoSizing
    Looking at the html of HN's pages, can't blame them really. Running though https://validator.w3.org/ , the result is abysmal. At this rate, if web browsers started requiring sites to output HTML that is somewhere in the realm of normalcy, HN would sooner shut down than consider ever updating. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • We Need to Talk More About Conformance, If We Want to Stop Fantasy HTML
    Whether you’re a frontend developer, lead, or manager, reconsider your expectations and practices if you haven’t yet chosen not to ship erroneous HTML. The more of us decide to talk about using actual HTML on our sites and in our apps, and lead by example, the better for our users and clients, and the better for our craft and profession. On the engineering side of web development, it’s HTML first—if it is HTML. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What is cross-browser compatibility, and why should you care?
    Validate Your Code Include tools like W3C code validation service and CSS validator to ensure your code meets web standards. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What You Need to Know About Domain and Hosting
    ===> Click here to run your code through the HTML validator. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Browsershots and W3C Markup Validation Service, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Rocket Validator - Site-wide Accessibility and HTML validation made easy. With a single click, Rocket Validator will check thousands of web pages on your site for Accessibility and HTML conformance, producing a detailed, actionable report on seconds.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Total Validator - Total Validator can check your website to help ensure that it is accessible, uses valid HTML and CSS, has no broken links, and is free from spelling mistakes.

Loading...