Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserCat VS Sorry-cypress

Compare BrowserCat VS Sorry-cypress and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BrowserCat logo BrowserCat

Easy, fast, and reliable browser automation and headless browser APIs. The web is messy, but your code shouldn't be.

Sorry-cypress logo Sorry-cypress

An open-source on-premise, self-hosted alternative to cypress dashboard - sorry-cypress/sorry-cypress
  • BrowserCat Home Page
    Home Page //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Metrics Dashboard
    Metrics Dashboard //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Easy Setup
    Easy Setup //
    2023-12-21

Finally, you can develop browser automation without the pain and the cost of deploying a fleet of headless browsers. Connect to BrowserCat, scale globally, and pay only for what you use. Scrape the web, automate your workflows, test your apps, generate beautiful images and pdfs from HTML, give you AI agent web access, and more.

Get started in minutes. Our forever-free plan gives you 1,000 free requests per month.

  • Sorry-cypress Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

BrowserCat

$ Details
freemium $10.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Safari

BrowserCat videos

No BrowserCat videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Sorry-cypress videos

Cypress for beginners | Execute test in PARALLEL with sorry-cypress locally

More videos:

  • Review - Sorry-Cypress como alternativa al dashboard de Cypress🤔

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserCat and Sorry-cypress)
Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Dev Ops
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing BrowserCat and Sorry-cypress.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built on robust open source technology that's under active development. The star of the show is Playwright, which is our recommended automation library. It's maintained by Microsoft, it officially supports JS, Python, Java, and .NET, and it's fast becoming the industry standard. BrowserCat also supports Puppeteer and numerous unofficial Playwright ports to Go, Rust, PHP, and Ruby.

What makes your product unique?

BrowserCat's answer

Unlike other headless browser providers, BrowserCat gives you total control over your browser instances for as long as you need them. Leverage the browsers cache, cookies, and storage for bespoke browser automation jobs that truly differentiate your business from the competition.

What's the story behind your product?

BrowserCat's answer

In previous corporate and startup gigs, I faced the challenge of developing robust, fast, and scalable browser automation. Most APIs in the space are too limiting for our needs and they were often incredibly slow. On the other hand, hosting your own headless browser fleet was a pain. I founded BrowserCat to make scaling up browser automation as easy, reliable, and affordable as deploying a serverless function.

How would you describe your primary audience?

BrowserCat's answer

We primarily serve developers, whether the seek to develop unique browser automation jobs or radically improve the performance of their integration tests. However, we frequently work with management, biz ops, and product leaders to solve problems they can't solve any way but through automation.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built for performance, scalability, stability, and affordability using modern web technologies. Many of our competitors were early to market and compete on entrenchment rather than functionality. Still others are bound by their existing users to continue supporting legacy tech, rather than embrace improved, modern standards. BrowserCat is focused on supporting your for the next ten years, rather than the past ten years.

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserCat and Sorry-cypress. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sorry-cypress seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserCat mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of BrowserCat yet. Tracking of BrowserCat recommendations started around Dec 2023.

Sorry-cypress mentions (1)

  • Scaling Cypress Tests: Parallelise your End-to-End Tests with Testkube
    Cypress offers features like test parallelization and analytics that help teams quicken their testing process. While initially expensive, it now has a free tier with limitations on the number of parallel tests you can run. To overcome this barrier, open-source alternatives like SorryCypress and managed solutions like Currents.dev emerged, offering unlimited parallelization and features previously exclusive to... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserCat and Sorry-cypress, you can also consider the following products

Microlink - Extract structured data from any website

Testkit - Testkit makes it super easy to create tests - just use our browser extension to record user interactions and create assertions. Additionally, Testkit automatically fixes flakiness and tests if they break, so you can focus on building!

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.