Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserCat VS ReadyAPI Performance

Compare BrowserCat VS ReadyAPI Performance and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BrowserCat logo BrowserCat

Easy, fast, and reliable browser automation and headless browser APIs. The web is messy, but your code shouldn't be.

ReadyAPI Performance logo ReadyAPI Performance

ReadyAPI Performance is a platform that offers Load Testing for REST and SOAP APIs, Microservices, and Databases.
  • BrowserCat Home Page
    Home Page //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Metrics Dashboard
    Metrics Dashboard //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Easy Setup
    Easy Setup //
    2023-12-21

Finally, you can develop browser automation without the pain and the cost of deploying a fleet of headless browsers. Connect to BrowserCat, scale globally, and pay only for what you use. Scrape the web, automate your workflows, test your apps, generate beautiful images and pdfs from HTML, give you AI agent web access, and more.

Get started in minutes. Our forever-free plan gives you 1,000 free requests per month.

  • ReadyAPI Performance Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

BrowserCat

$ Details
freemium $10.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Safari

BrowserCat features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

ReadyAPI Performance features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    ReadyAPI Performance offers extensive capabilities for testing APIs, including automated performance testing alongside functional, security, and virtualization within a single platform. This integration ensures thorough evaluation of API behavior under various conditions.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive graphical interface, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical users for creating and executing performance tests without requiring advanced coding skills.
  • Integration with Popular CI/CD Tools
    ReadyAPI Performance seamlessly integrates with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and Git, facilitating automated testing and accelerated development pipelines.
  • Real-Time Analytics and Reporting
    It offers real-time analytics and dynamic reporting features that provide immediate insights into performance bottlenecks and test results, helping teams make swift data-driven decisions.
  • Support for Multiple Protocols
    The tool supports a wide range of protocols such as REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and others, enabling comprehensive performance testing across diverse API types.

Possible disadvantages of ReadyAPI Performance

  • Cost
    ReadyAPI Performance can be expensive for small businesses or individual developers, as it is a commercial product with licensing fees that might not fit all budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    The platform might require significant system resources for running extensive performance tests, which could impact other applications if not managed properly on less powerful machines.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While ReadyAPI Performance is designed to be user-friendly, leveraging its advanced features and integrations might require a deeper learning curve and familiarity with the environment.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Some users have reported that the application can suffer from lags or slow performance, particularly when handling very large datasets or executing complex test scenarios.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source solutions, ReadyAPI Performance may have less community-driven support and resources, putting more reliance on official support and documentation provided by SmartBear.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserCat and ReadyAPI Performance)
Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing BrowserCat and ReadyAPI Performance.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built on robust open source technology that's under active development. The star of the show is Playwright, which is our recommended automation library. It's maintained by Microsoft, it officially supports JS, Python, Java, and .NET, and it's fast becoming the industry standard. BrowserCat also supports Puppeteer and numerous unofficial Playwright ports to Go, Rust, PHP, and Ruby.

What makes your product unique?

BrowserCat's answer

Unlike other headless browser providers, BrowserCat gives you total control over your browser instances for as long as you need them. Leverage the browsers cache, cookies, and storage for bespoke browser automation jobs that truly differentiate your business from the competition.

What's the story behind your product?

BrowserCat's answer

In previous corporate and startup gigs, I faced the challenge of developing robust, fast, and scalable browser automation. Most APIs in the space are too limiting for our needs and they were often incredibly slow. On the other hand, hosting your own headless browser fleet was a pain. I founded BrowserCat to make scaling up browser automation as easy, reliable, and affordable as deploying a serverless function.

How would you describe your primary audience?

BrowserCat's answer

We primarily serve developers, whether the seek to develop unique browser automation jobs or radically improve the performance of their integration tests. However, we frequently work with management, biz ops, and product leaders to solve problems they can't solve any way but through automation.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built for performance, scalability, stability, and affordability using modern web technologies. Many of our competitors were early to market and compete on entrenchment rather than functionality. Still others are bound by their existing users to continue supporting legacy tech, rather than embrace improved, modern standards. BrowserCat is focused on supporting your for the next ten years, rather than the past ten years.

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserCat and ReadyAPI Performance. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserCat and ReadyAPI Performance, you can also consider the following products

Microlink - Extract structured data from any website

dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework

QAComplete - Get award winning tools for all of your Software Quality needs and start improving your desktop and web applications today. Free trials are available for all.