Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserCat VS PhearJS

Compare BrowserCat VS PhearJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BrowserCat logo BrowserCat

Easy, fast, and reliable browser automation and headless browser APIs. The web is messy, but your code shouldn't be.

PhearJS logo PhearJS

Render any dynamic Javascript webpage to JSON with PhantomJS.
  • BrowserCat Home Page
    Home Page //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Metrics Dashboard
    Metrics Dashboard //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Easy Setup
    Easy Setup //
    2023-12-21

Finally, you can develop browser automation without the pain and the cost of deploying a fleet of headless browsers. Connect to BrowserCat, scale globally, and pay only for what you use. Scrape the web, automate your workflows, test your apps, generate beautiful images and pdfs from HTML, give you AI agent web access, and more.

Get started in minutes. Our forever-free plan gives you 1,000 free requests per month.

  • PhearJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-17

BrowserCat

$ Details
freemium $10.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Safari

PhearJS

Website
phear.io
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-

BrowserCat features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

PhearJS features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    PhearJS provides an easy-to-use interface for web scraping, making it accessible to developers with varying levels of expertise.
  • JavaScript Rendering
    It can render JavaScript-heavy websites, which allows it to scrape modern sites that rely heavily on client-side scripting.
  • Proxy Support
    PhearJS supports the use of proxies, which can help in bypassing rate limits and accessing geo-restricted content.
  • Customizable
    The platform allows for customization in the scraping process, offering flexibility to users in handling various web scraping requirements.

Possible disadvantages of PhearJS

  • Limited Control
    While PhearJS is easy to use, the abstraction may limit control over some advanced settings compared to more code-intensive solutions.
  • Dependency on Phear.io
    Relying on a third-party service means users are dependent on the availability and reliability of Phear.io’s infrastructure.
  • Potential Cost
    Depending on usage, the cost of using PhearJS can add up, especially for large-scale scraping operations.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although it is generally easy to use, mastering advanced features may require time and experience.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserCat and PhearJS)
Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing BrowserCat and PhearJS.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built on robust open source technology that's under active development. The star of the show is Playwright, which is our recommended automation library. It's maintained by Microsoft, it officially supports JS, Python, Java, and .NET, and it's fast becoming the industry standard. BrowserCat also supports Puppeteer and numerous unofficial Playwright ports to Go, Rust, PHP, and Ruby.

What makes your product unique?

BrowserCat's answer

Unlike other headless browser providers, BrowserCat gives you total control over your browser instances for as long as you need them. Leverage the browsers cache, cookies, and storage for bespoke browser automation jobs that truly differentiate your business from the competition.

What's the story behind your product?

BrowserCat's answer

In previous corporate and startup gigs, I faced the challenge of developing robust, fast, and scalable browser automation. Most APIs in the space are too limiting for our needs and they were often incredibly slow. On the other hand, hosting your own headless browser fleet was a pain. I founded BrowserCat to make scaling up browser automation as easy, reliable, and affordable as deploying a serverless function.

How would you describe your primary audience?

BrowserCat's answer

We primarily serve developers, whether the seek to develop unique browser automation jobs or radically improve the performance of their integration tests. However, we frequently work with management, biz ops, and product leaders to solve problems they can't solve any way but through automation.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built for performance, scalability, stability, and affordability using modern web technologies. Many of our competitors were early to market and compete on entrenchment rather than functionality. Still others are bound by their existing users to continue supporting legacy tech, rather than embrace improved, modern standards. BrowserCat is focused on supporting your for the next ten years, rather than the past ten years.

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserCat and PhearJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserCat and PhearJS, you can also consider the following products

Microlink - Extract structured data from any website

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework

Screenster - 10x faster UI testing without a line of code.