Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserCat VS Browserbite

Compare BrowserCat VS Browserbite and see what are their differences

The page you are looking for does not exist

BrowserCat logo BrowserCat

Easy, fast, and reliable browser automation and headless browser APIs. The web is messy, but your code shouldn't be.

Browserbite logo Browserbite

Automatic cross browser layout testing
  • BrowserCat Home Page
    Home Page //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Metrics Dashboard
    Metrics Dashboard //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Easy Setup
    Easy Setup //
    2023-12-21

Finally, you can develop browser automation without the pain and the cost of deploying a fleet of headless browsers. Connect to BrowserCat, scale globally, and pay only for what you use. Scrape the web, automate your workflows, test your apps, generate beautiful images and pdfs from HTML, give you AI agent web access, and more.

Get started in minutes. Our forever-free plan gives you 1,000 free requests per month.

  • Browserbite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-12

BrowserCat

$ Details
freemium $10.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Safari

BrowserCat features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Browserbite features and specs

  • Cross-Browser Testing
    Browserbite enables users to perform comprehensive cross-browser testing, ensuring their website appears consistent and functions correctly across different web browsers.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform is designed to be user-friendly, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise, providing a smooth experience for testing web applications.
  • Automated Testing
    Browserbite offers automated testing capabilities which save time and reduce the manual effort required for testing web applications across multiple environments.
  • Detailed Reports
    The tool provides detailed and actionable reports highlighting discrepancies and issues, allowing developers to quickly identify and resolve browser compatibility problems.

Possible disadvantages of Browserbite

  • Limited Browser Support
    Browserbite might not cover all browser versions or less popular browsers, which could be a limitation for users needing exhaustive testing on various platforms.
  • Pricing
    The cost associated with using Browserbite could be a concern, particularly for smaller companies or individual developers looking for budget-friendly solutions.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, new users might experience a learning curve when navigating the platform's more advanced features and settings.
  • Performance
    Depending on the complexity of the tests and the number of browsers involved, performance might be an issue, especially if server resources are insufficient to handle high demand.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserCat and Browserbite)
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Crawling
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing BrowserCat and Browserbite.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built on robust open source technology that's under active development. The star of the show is Playwright, which is our recommended automation library. It's maintained by Microsoft, it officially supports JS, Python, Java, and .NET, and it's fast becoming the industry standard. BrowserCat also supports Puppeteer and numerous unofficial Playwright ports to Go, Rust, PHP, and Ruby.

What makes your product unique?

BrowserCat's answer

Unlike other headless browser providers, BrowserCat gives you total control over your browser instances for as long as you need them. Leverage the browsers cache, cookies, and storage for bespoke browser automation jobs that truly differentiate your business from the competition.

What's the story behind your product?

BrowserCat's answer

In previous corporate and startup gigs, I faced the challenge of developing robust, fast, and scalable browser automation. Most APIs in the space are too limiting for our needs and they were often incredibly slow. On the other hand, hosting your own headless browser fleet was a pain. I founded BrowserCat to make scaling up browser automation as easy, reliable, and affordable as deploying a serverless function.

How would you describe your primary audience?

BrowserCat's answer

We primarily serve developers, whether the seek to develop unique browser automation jobs or radically improve the performance of their integration tests. However, we frequently work with management, biz ops, and product leaders to solve problems they can't solve any way but through automation.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built for performance, scalability, stability, and affordability using modern web technologies. Many of our competitors were early to market and compete on entrenchment rather than functionality. Still others are bound by their existing users to continue supporting legacy tech, rather than embrace improved, modern standards. BrowserCat is focused on supporting your for the next ten years, rather than the past ten years.

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserCat and Browserbite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserCat and Browserbite, you can also consider the following products

Microlink - Extract structured data from any website

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

Ghost Inspector - Easily create automated browser tests for your websites and web apps. Ensure everything works and looks the way it should. No coding required. 14 day free trial!

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS