Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BrowseEmAll VS IETester

Compare BrowseEmAll VS IETester and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

BrowseEmAll logo BrowseEmAll

Cross browser testing tool BrowseEmAll. Test your website in more than 25 web and mobile browsers on your local machine. No cloud services involved!

IETester logo IETester

ietester is an application that allows to test on multiple ie versions at the same time in the same application
  • BrowseEmAll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-31
  • IETester Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

BrowseEmAll features and specs

  • Cross-Browser Testing
    BrowseEmAll allows users to test websites across multiple browsers, ensuring compatibility and functionality on various platforms.
  • Local Testing
    Users can perform testing on their local machines without having to deploy to a server, saving time and access to internal setups.
  • Responsive Design Testing
    The tool provides features to test and validate responsive designs across various screen sizes and devices.
  • Full-page Screenshots
    BrowseEmAll offers the ability to capture full-page screenshots, which can be useful for documenting layouts and visual elements.
  • Automation Support
    It supports automation features which help in running extended testing procedures efficiently and can be easily integrated into CI/CD pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of BrowseEmAll

  • Limited Browser Versions
    The selection of browser versions may be limited compared to other services, which can impact testing older or non-standard browsers.
  • Performance
    Running multiple browser instances simultaneously on a local machine may require significant system resources, potentially slowing down performance.
  • User Interface Complexity
    Users might find the user interface somewhat complex or less intuitive, which could lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Cost
    BrowseEmAll can be relatively expensive for small teams or individual developers compared to some other testing solutions, making it less accessible for all.
  • OS Compatibility
    While it supports major operating systems, some features or compatibility might vary across different OS environments, potentially limiting functionality for some users.

IETester features and specs

  • Multiple IE Versions
    IETester allows testing of different versions of Internet Explorer (IE5.5 to IE11) on a single machine without the need for multiple VM setups.
  • Free Tool
    IETester is a free tool, making it an attractive option for developers with budget constraints wishing to test IE compatibility.
  • Easy Installation
    The installation process for IETester is straightforward and doesn’t require any complex configurations or system adjustments.

Possible disadvantages of IETester

  • Stability Issues
    Users have reported frequent crashes and instability, which can disrupt the testing process and limit usability.
  • Rendering Accuracy
    The rendering might not accurately reflect actual browsers due to differences in the underlying browser engines used in IETester.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to modern browser testing tools, IETester lacks advanced features such as debugging tools and developer extensions.
  • Outdated Support
    IETester has not been updated in a long time, raising concerns about its compatibility with newer systems and potential security vulnerabilities.

BrowseEmAll videos

+ Add

Run BrowseEmAll Natively on macOS and Linux

More videos:

  • Review - BrowseEmAll - All browsers in one place

IETester videos

+ Add

Review: IETester

More videos:

  • Demo - IETester quick demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowseEmAll and IETester)

BrowseEmAll

IETester

Website Testing
46 46%
Website Testing
54% 54
Browser Testing
38 38%
Browser Testing
62% 62
Automated Testing
47 47%
Automated Testing
53% 53
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowseEmAll and IETester. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowseEmAll and IETester, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Browsershots - Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Litmus - litmus tests and tracks your email campaigns, so you can always put your best design forward.

Loading...