Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Brick FTP VS Azure Archive Storage

Compare Brick FTP VS Azure Archive Storage and see what are their differences

Picflow
Online gallery and proofing platform for creative professionals. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Brick FTP logo Brick FTP

Enterprise-ready file server solution

Azure Archive Storage logo Azure Archive Storage

Low cost, secure cloud storage for rarely accessed data.
  • Brick FTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-20
  • Azure Archive Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Brick FTP and Azure Archive Storage)

Brick FTP

Azure Archive Storage

Cloud Storage
50 50%
Cloud Storage
50% 50
File Sharing
57 57%
File Sharing
43% 43
Cloud Computing
70 70%
Cloud Computing
30% 30
FTP And File Uploads
100 100%
FTP And File Uploads
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Brick FTP and Azure Archive Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Archive Storage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Brick FTP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Brick FTP yet. Tracking of Brick FTP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Archive Storage mentions (3)

  • best practice and cheapest way to store or archive big amounts of data
    This! Glacier is very cheap and is a great option to store archival data. OP should be aware that it would take a while to retrieve data if needed. As mentioned, Azure Archive Storage is a nice option as well. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Best cloud storage for reasonable price
    Cheaper than that would be Azure Archive or AWS Glacier since their storage costs $0.00099 per month for 1GB, but it takes a while to retrieve data back. If you need a long-term archival for cheap, their archive storage is worth your considerations. Https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/archive/ Https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Top 30 Microsoft Azure Services
    If you're deploying applications to the cloud, you'll need persistent data storage. Azure Blob Storage allows scalable storage for objects and files and provides an SDK to easily access them. Blob storage is a great trigger for Azure Functions, where uploading a file can automatically run your custom logic in the cloud (for example, if you wanted to run OCR on a file as soon as it's uploaded to a storage... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Brick FTP and Azure Archive Storage, you can also consider the following products

ExaVault - ExaVault is your Secure Cloud FTP platform -- trusted by over 5,000 companies from Adobe to Zillow. Instant setup for manual and automated transfers with a full web interface and direct FTP, FTPS and SFTP support.

Mimecast Cloud Archive - Reduce costs with Mimecast's cloud archive to move to the cloud with a single, secure archive for email, files and other content.

SmartFile - Secure file sharing & FTP hosting for the ​enterprise.

Amazon Glacier - Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost storage service for data archiving and long-term backup.

Rackspace - More than 100,000 businesses trust Rackspace with their hosting and cloud computing. Get cloud, managed and hybrid hosting all backed by Fanatical Support.

Public Cloud Archive - Learn about cloud archiving, the difference between hybrid and full-service cloud archive offerings, and the key cloud archive vendors and offerings in the market today.

Loading...