A good starting point is to use large-scale network analysis on the bots to establish to what extent they are connected (e.g by mentions, retweets or follows) and then see if there are any outliers in the resulting network that look more organic (applying something like the Botometer API). Source: over 1 year ago

If in doubt about a user, ask them directly if they are being paid for their time online. Often the response is cagey, insulting, or redirecting, which should tell you everything you need to know. If they deny that they're being paid, check their post history to see how many hours a day they are posting, and which hours each day they are posting-- normal people do not have eight hours a day to post. Also check... Source: over 1 year ago

Https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/04/09/bots-in-the-twittersphere/ "An estimated two-thirds of tweeted links to popular websites are posted by automated accounts – not human beings' Complete Report PDF (2018): https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2018/04/PI_2018.04.09_Twitter-Bots_FINAL.pdf "Botometer": https://botometer.osome.iu.edu/ "Botometer (formerly BotOrNot) checks the... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

You can start here. Musk running Twitter bots - for a long time at that - is pretty much common knowledge. Like this is how he became so insanely rich and why Tesla is so insanely overvalued by historical market KPIs. Source: about 2 years ago

MediaSmarts has developed a custom fact-checker search engine, which you can use to Google something you saw. All the results will be from verified fact-checkers. There’s also a tool that will tell you the likelihood that an account is a bot. Source: about 2 years ago

If you want uncensored.. https://gab.ai. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

I don't understand how you can stop spam yet not have the structures in place to censor forbidden views or opinions. Without admin moderation you get 50 million flavours of porn (like old Usenet servers) some of which will be illegal porn, a massive slice of QAnon and conspiracy (like Odyssee and gab.ai), information and propaganda useful to terrorists (like the old totse.com) and dark web drug markets. Source: over 2 years ago

This already exists in the "Dissenter browser" made by the folks over at gab.ai. This could work as a third party extension, but direct support from Brave would instantly draw controversy as it's perceived that the only reason Dissenter exists is to support toxic radical right wingers. Source: over 2 years ago

I feel that there is still space for a platform for content creators which is away from any restrictions. I was talking to a lawyer friend of mine about drafting a user agreement which makes it impossible for anyone to sue any content creator or the platform, or for any government or group to force removal of content. but in the end we figured that we would need a back to back agreement with our service... Source: almost 3 years ago