Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BMC Compuware ISPW VS Codeship

Compare BMC Compuware ISPW VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BMC Compuware ISPW logo BMC Compuware ISPW

BMC Compuware ISPW is a comprehensive enterprise change management software that comes with modern mainframe CI/CD tools to have completely secured and streamlined mainframe code pipelines for the whole DevOps lifecycle.

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • BMC Compuware ISPW Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

BMC Compuware ISPW features and specs

  • Integration
    BMC Compuware ISPW offers seamless integration with modern DevOps tools, facilitating streamlined development and deployment processes.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    ISPW improves collaboration among development teams by providing a centralized platform for managing mainframe source code and ensuring version control.
  • Scalability
    The tool is scalable and can handle the complex requirements of large organizations, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive mainframe operations.
  • Automation
    ISPW supports automation of workflow processes, which reduces manual efforts and speeds up deployment cycles.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform features a modern and intuitive interface, which enhances usability and shortens the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of BMC Compuware ISPW

  • Cost
    BMC Compuware ISPW can be expensive for small to medium-sized enterprises, as it is designed primarily for larger organizations with more resources.
  • Complexity
    The tool's comprehensive feature set can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time and effort to fully understand and utilize all its capabilities.
  • Mainframe Focus
    ISPW is primarily designed for mainframe environments, which may limit its usefulness for organizations that do not rely heavily on these systems.
  • Dependency
    Organizations may become overly dependent on the tool for their software development lifecycle, potentially leading to challenges in adopting other solutions later.
  • Integration Challenges
    Despite strong integration capabilities, some organizations may encounter challenges when integrating ISPW with existing legacy systems or non-standard tools.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

BMC Compuware ISPW videos

No BMC Compuware ISPW videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codeship videos

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BMC Compuware ISPW and Codeship)
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Continuous Deployment
8 8%
92% 92
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BMC Compuware ISPW and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BMC Compuware ISPW and Codeship

BMC Compuware ISPW Reviews

We have no reviews of BMC Compuware ISPW yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BMC Compuware ISPW and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

Envoyer - Envoyer is zero downtime PHP deployments.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Azure DevOps Projects - Azure DevOps Projects is a platform that lets you create projects and establish a repository for submitting source codes.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

buddybuild - Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless system. With buddybuild, you can focus on what matters most: creating awesome apps.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.