Blazer VS Content Square

I try to avoid these tools wherever possible, given the choice I'd always go for tools like Blazer. https://github.com/ankane/blazer No such luck in my current role, Looker and PowerBI are both in use by different bits of the org and nobody has the ability to delve into the underlying figures. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

As u/jaxn said you could use Blazer for this kind of thing. I would also look into materialized views or custom tables and a scheduled job that calculates the metrics they care about. That will take you a long way. Eventually you can use something like Metabase but I would put that off for as long as possible as it's really expensive and pretty involved. Source: 10 months ago

And it's Open Source: https://github.com/evidence-dev/evidence if you are into the Ruby on Rails world. It's super solid, and it's been an indispensable tool integrated to all my projects. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I use Ahoy too, but I don't have very good visibility into the data. I should spend more time building queries and creating charts. I should probably set up blazer as well: https://github.com/ankane/blazer. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

The Blazer gem provides a nice way to analyze the results easily. It is simple to install and allows SQL queries to run against tables. The query here shows that the candidate implementation is significantly faster than the original. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Heap might be good but they are crazy expensive. We were quoted something like a quarter million dollars. Good luck getting that signed off, plus you still need quite technical analysts to run the thing. I've found https://contentsquare.com/ to be much better received by juniors and seniors alike, and it's a fraction of the cost of heap. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago