Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bitbucket Pipelines VS Apache Gump

Compare Bitbucket Pipelines VS Apache Gump and see what are their differences

Bitbucket Pipelines logo Bitbucket Pipelines

Bitbucket Pipelines brings continuous integration and delivery to Bitbucket cloud, empowering teams to build, test, and deploy their code.

Apache Gump logo Apache Gump

Apache Gump is a continuous integration tool.
  • Bitbucket Pipelines Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-23
  • Apache Gump Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-04

Bitbucket Pipelines features and specs

  • Integration with Bitbucket
    Bitbucket Pipelines integrates seamlessly with Bitbucket, offering a unified experience for code management and CI/CD. This integration simplifies the development workflow by allowing users to manage their code repository and pipelines in one place.
  • Ease of Setup
    Setting up CI/CD pipelines with Bitbucket Pipelines is straightforward and user-friendly. The service provides templates and guides to help users quickly configure their pipelines.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being a cloud-based service, Bitbucket Pipelines does not require any hardware setup or maintenance, reducing overhead and costs associated with on-premise infrastructure.
  • Built-in Docker Support
    Bitbucket Pipelines natively supports Docker, allowing for containerized builds and deployments. This makes it easier to create consistent and reproducible build environments.
  • Scalability
    As a cloud-based CI/CD solution, Bitbucket Pipelines scales easily, accommodating growing projects and teams. Users can scale their build resources up or down based on demand.
  • Cost-effectiveness for Small Teams
    Bitbucket Pipelines offers a free tier which is particularly beneficial for small teams and individual developers. This helps to manage costs while still providing robust CI/CD capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Bitbucket Pipelines

  • Limited Free Tier
    While Bitbucket Pipelines offers a free tier, it comes with limitations in build minutes and concurrency. Large projects or teams may need to upgrade to a paid plan, which can increase costs.
  • Build Time Restrictions
    Parallel builds and build minutes are restricted based on the pricing plan. This can be a limitation for projects requiring extensive CI/CD operations, impacting development speed.
  • Complexity in Advanced Scenarios
    For advanced CI/CD scenarios, Bitbucket Pipelines may require significant customization. Users may find it challenging to implement complex workflows compared to more feature-rich CI/CD solutions.
  • Locked to Bitbucket
    Bitbucket Pipelines is tied to the Bitbucket platform. Switching to or integrating with other version control systems might not be as seamless, potentially leading to vendor lock-in.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based service, Bitbucket Pipelines requires a stable internet connection for consistent operation. Any disruptions in connectivity can affect build and deployment processes.
  • Less Mature Ecosystem
    Compared to some other CI/CD tools (like Jenkins or GitLab CI), Bitbucket Pipelines has a smaller ecosystem and fewer plugins or third-party integrations available.

Apache Gump features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Bitbucket Pipelines videos

Continuous Delivery in the Cloud with Bitbucket Pipelines - Atlassian Summit 2016

Apache Gump videos

No Apache Gump videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bitbucket Pipelines and Apache Gump)
Continuous Integration
89 89%
11% 11
DevOps Tools
85 85%
15% 15
Continuous Deployment
83 83%
17% 17
Backend Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Bitbucket Pipelines and Apache Gump. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bitbucket Pipelines and Apache Gump

Bitbucket Pipelines Reviews

Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
A key feature is the platform’s ability to provide end-to-end visibility of CI/CD activity, including within Jira issues. This makes it easy for devs and operators to see what’s shipped or is currently being built without needing to cross-reference multiple tools. BitBucket pipelines also support self-service developer access through Jira Service Management, allowing admins...
Source: spacelift.io

Apache Gump Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Gump yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bitbucket Pipelines and Apache Gump, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Bitrise - Tens of thousands of agencies, startups and enterprise companies with mobile apps - including Runkeeper, Grindr, Duolingo and more - use Bitrise to automate their way to increased productivity & speed

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Codefresh - Continuous Delivery and Collaboration Platform for Docker.