Based on our record, Bazel should be more popular than Buck. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Wow, if you curl it, there's a lot of boilerplate code there. Maybe built using Bazel? https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
This is a problem that Bazel (https://bazel.build) solves in a very convenient way. You can just keep using the paths relative to the repository root, and as long as you properly declare your test needs that file it will access it without problems. Or you can use the runfile libraries to access them too. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
> None of this solves C's only REAL problem (in my opinion) which is the lack of dependency management. Bazel solves this really nicely, I know some people have strong opinions on it but I cannot recommend it enough https://bazel.build/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: 11 months ago
Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 2 years ago
That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago
CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..
SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.
Apache Maven - Apache Maven is a project comprehension and management software tool.
Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.