Based on our record, Bandwidth should be more popular than Google App Engine. It has been mentiond 73 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I know this was a scam, but I spooked them (or broke the bot?) before I heard their plan. I did a reverse image search, and I found nothing. I looked at the metadata on the image, but I saw nothing useful. I looked up the number and found out it was a virtual number from bandwidth.com. I didn't know what to do after that, so I just reported the number to bandwidth. Source: 6 months ago
I wanted to add a secondary provider though with Direct Routing for fail over but was looking for recommendations. I'm in Canada so prefer someone with a Canadian POP but not mandatory. I also prefer self-signup when possible, similar to Telnyx, Flowroute etc. I was checking bandwidth.com as I see they do this but it doesn't let you sign up and wants you to contact sales. That's fine and I was planning on... Source: over 1 year ago
You can pop your area code and prefix in the link below and see what providers do have a presence. Obviously, Sprint/T-Mobile will be one of them but if you don't see bandwidth.com then you're out of luck and there are no workarounds. Source: over 1 year ago
Your provider should be able to provide a short code (e.g. '933' if using bandwidth.com) that will read out the e911 information for the number calling. Source: over 1 year ago
While I think you have your answer, another way to validate a number is to use https://freecarrierlookup.com/ and check the phone number. From that you can often tell if it is a "web only" number that a scammer outside the US would use. For example, it might belong to bandwidth.com or google voice. If it does belong to Bandwidth.com you can report it to them, and they are really fast at cancelling scammers. Source: over 1 year ago
In 2008, Google launched AppEngine. This product predates the formal existence of Google Cloud and can be considered Google Cloud's first offering. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
To deploy the app, we can use Google Cloud App Engine, which is specifically built for server-side rendered websites. After we create a new project in the Google Cloud Console, we have to configure the cql-trace-viewer application. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
I've read that article, but I'm thinking there are other better (and most importantly cheaper) ways of doing that, such as using App Engine (given that you have to mitigate the maximum request timeout and to make sure there are constantly exactly 1 instance running). Source: about 1 year ago
Shout out to GCP App Engine for deploying anode/Express severe. Source: about 1 year ago
If your project is a bit more complicated using next.js or react.js or angular.js, you may find some free Platfrom-as-a-Service%20is%20a%20complete%20cloud%20environment,middleware%2C%20tools%2C%20and%20more.). I have seen some of my peers using free PaaS like Heroku, Vercel and I have no experience in using PaaS but I will recommend you to use PaaS from either of the three 1. Google Cloud's Google App Engine 2.... Source: about 1 year ago
Twilio - Brings voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.
Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.
Plivo - Plivo simplifies your customer engagement.
Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash
Nexmo - Nexmo is a simple two way SMS API with global reach and wholesale rates
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.