Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bandwidth Controller VS Control-M for Mainframe

Compare Bandwidth Controller VS Control-M for Mainframe and see what are their differences

Bandwidth Controller logo Bandwidth Controller

Bandwidth manager software for Windows 2000, XP, and 2003 Server.

Control-M for Mainframe logo Control-M for Mainframe

BMC helps customers run and reinvent their businesses with open, scalable, and modular solutions to complex IT problems.
  • Bandwidth Controller Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07
  • Control-M for Mainframe Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bandwidth Controller and Control-M for Mainframe)
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
29 29%
71% 71
Security
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Bandwidth Controller and Control-M for Mainframe. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bandwidth Controller and Control-M for Mainframe, you can also consider the following products

Azure Load Balancer - Azure Load Balancer delivers high availability and network performance to the applications.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

Azure Traffic Manager - Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of user traffic for service endpoints in different datacenters.

Traefik - Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy