Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Azure Traffic Manager VS H2O HTTP server

Compare Azure Traffic Manager VS H2O HTTP server and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Azure Traffic Manager logo Azure Traffic Manager

Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of user traffic for service endpoints in different datacenters.

H2O HTTP server logo H2O HTTP server

H2O is a new generation HTTP server that provides quicker response to users with less CPU, memory bandwidth utilization when compared to older generation of web servers.
  • Azure Traffic Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-26
  • H2O HTTP server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-24

Azure Traffic Manager features and specs

  • Geographic Distribution
    Azure Traffic Manager allows for distributing traffic based on geographic location, which can improve load balancing and reduce latency for users by directing them to the closest endpoint.
  • Automatic Failover
    Provides automatic failover capabilities to ensure high availability by redirecting traffic to another endpoint if one goes down, improving service reliability.
  • Traffic Routing Methods
    Supports various routing methods such as priority, weighted, performance, and geographic, offering flexibility in controlling how traffic is distributed.
  • Integration with Azure Services
    Seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft Azure services, making it easier to implement and manage for organizations already using Azure.
  • Scalability
    Scales automatically to handle the demands of high-volume applications without requiring manual intervention, providing better performance management.
  • Customizable Health Probes
    Allows users to set up customizable health probes to continuously monitor the health of endpoints, ensuring traffic is directed based on endpoint availability.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Traffic Manager

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring Azure Traffic Manager can be complex, especially for users who are not familiar with Azure or network configurations.
  • Dependency on External Services
    As a cloud-based service, it is dependent on Azure infrastructure. Any issues within Azure could potentially impact Traffic Manager performance.
  • Cost
    While Traffic Manager can optimize performance, it can also increase costs, particularly for smaller businesses or those with fluctuating traffic patterns.
  • Limited Control Over Underlying Infrastructure
    Users have limited control over the underlying Azure infrastructure, which can be a disadvantage for those who require more granular control.
  • Potential Latency
    While Traffic Manager can reduce latency by routing to nearby endpoints, the initial DNS query routing might introduce some latency.

H2O HTTP server features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Azure Traffic Manager videos

+ Add

Azure Traffic Manager Vlog 1

H2O HTTP server videos

No H2O HTTP server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Traffic Manager and H2O HTTP server)

Azure Traffic Manager

H2O HTTP server

Web And Application Servers
94 94%
Web And Application Servers
6% 6
Web Servers
87 87%
Web Servers
13% 13
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
100 100%
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Traffic Manager and H2O HTTP server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, H2O HTTP server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Traffic Manager mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Azure Traffic Manager yet. Tracking of Azure Traffic Manager recommendations started around Mar 2021.

H2O HTTP server mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Traffic Manager and H2O HTTP server, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.

Caddy - The HTTP/2 Web Server with Automatic HTTPS

Traefik - Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

Loading...