Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Sphere VS Cyberbit

Compare Azure Sphere VS Cyberbit and see what are their differences

Azure Sphere logo Azure Sphere

Help protect your connected IoT devices, such as MCUs and crossover modules, development kits, and guardian devices, with Azure Sphere.

Cyberbit logo Cyberbit

Cyberbit provides the most widely used Cyber Range training and simulation platform, as well as SOAR, ICS Security and EDR for IT/OT detection and response.
  • Azure Sphere Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-12
  • Cyberbit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05

Azure Sphere features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security
    Azure Sphere provides end-to-end security features that include hardware root of trust, defense in depth, and certificate-based authentication, which help protect IoT devices from evolving threats.
  • Cloud Connectivity
    Azure Sphere is designed to securely connect devices to the internet and enable seamless integration with Azure IoT services, allowing for efficient data management and analytics.
  • Simplified Development
    The platform includes a secure operating system and development tools that simplify the process of building and deploying secure applications for IoT devices.
  • Automated Software Updates
    Azure Sphere provides over-the-air updates, ensuring that devices consistently receive the latest security patches and software improvements automatically.
  • Scalability
    Azure Sphere is built to scale, making it suitable for small-scale deployments as well as large, complex IoT ecosystems, helping businesses grow without sacrificing security or performance.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Sphere

  • Initial Cost
    Implementing Azure Sphere may involve higher upfront costs due to the requirement of specific hardware and integration, which might not be suitable for all budgets.
  • Limited Hardware Compatibility
    The platform is designed to work with specific certified devices, which restricts the choice of hardware compared to more open systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers may face a learning curve when starting with Azure Sphere, especially if they are not familiar with Microsoft's ecosystem or IoT security best practices.
  • Dependency on Azure
    To fully leverage the capabilities of Azure Sphere, users might feel a dependency on Microsoft's Azure cloud services, which could lead to vendor lock-in.
  • Complex Deployment for Large Scale
    While Azure Sphere supports large-scale deployment, managing and orchestrating thousands of connected devices securely and effectively can become complex and require additional planning and resources.

Cyberbit features and specs

  • Comprehensive Cyber Range Platform
    Cyberbit offers a comprehensive cyber range platform that provides hyper-realistic simulations, helping organizations to effectively train their cybersecurity teams and improve their incident response skills.
  • Wide Range of Scenarios
    The platform supports a wide range of scenarios and attack vectors, allowing teams to practice responding to various potential threats and vulnerabilities, increasing preparedness and resilience.
  • Customizable Training Environment
    Cyberbit's platform allows for customization of training environments, enabling organizations to simulate their specific network conditions and security infrastructure, which leads to more relevant and applicable training experiences.
  • Assessment and Evaluation Tools
    The platform includes tools for assessing and evaluating the performance of cybersecurity teams, providing valuable insights into their strengths and areas for improvement, which helps in tailoring future training sessions.
  • Expert Support and Resources
    Cyberbit provides expert support and a wealth of resources to help organizations maximize their investment in cybersecurity training and maintain the effectiveness of their security strategies.

Possible disadvantages of Cyberbit

  • Cost
    The high cost of implementing and maintaining a Cyberbit cyber range platform might be prohibitive for some smaller organizations, limiting its accessibility to larger enterprises with substantial budgets.
  • Complexity of Setup
    Setting up and configuring Cyberbit's training environment can be complex and time-consuming, requiring dedicated IT resources and potentially slowing down deployment.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The comprehensive nature and high level of detail provided in Cyberbit's platform may present a steep learning curve for users not familiar with advanced cybersecurity concepts or simulation platforms.
  • Dependence on Skilled Facilitators
    To extract the maximum value from the platform, organizations may need skilled facilitators who can guide training sessions and provide insights, adding another layer of requirement and potential cost.
  • Internet Connectivity Requirement
    Dependence on stable internet connectivity might limit accessibility and performance, particularly for remote teams or those in regions with less reliable internet infrastructure.

Azure Sphere videos

Azure Sphere Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Introducing Azure Sphere
  • Review - Azure Sphere MT3620 Development Kit

Cyberbit videos

MITRE ATT&CK Collection Techniques Demonstrated on Cyberbit Range

More videos:

  • Review - Training Your Team on Cyberbit's Hyper Realistic Cyberbit Range
  • Review - Annexus Technologies & Cyberbit Webinar: Overview

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Sphere and Cyberbit)
Data Dashboard
49 49%
51% 51
Monitoring Tools
45 45%
55% 55
Online Services
81 81%
19% 19
IoT Platform
47 47%
53% 53

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Sphere and Cyberbit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Sphere seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Sphere mentions (2)

  • BitLocker, TPM and Pluton | What Are They and How Do They Work
    Pluton is a dedicated physical chip that runs on Azure sphere architecture. It is very much out of band and is technically physically on the same die as the CPU, but the CPU has no control over it at all because it has its own dedicated self-maintaining operating system. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Operating System in the IoT space
    Microsoft developed a Linux-based operating system for IoT devices called Azure Sphere. But it hasn't really caught on. Source: over 3 years ago

Cyberbit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cyberbit yet. Tracking of Cyberbit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Sphere and Cyberbit, you can also consider the following products

AWS IoT Device Defender - Manage the security of your fleet. With AWS IoT Device Defender, you can audit and monitor device configurations. Get started today.

Armis - The leading enterprise-class agentless device security platform to address the new threat landscape of unmanaged and IoT devices.

Symantec Critical System Protection - Symantec Critical System Protection is a flexible and compact behavioral security engine built with application whitelisting infused with anti-exploits for managed or standalone IoT devices.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

Broadkey - BroadKey: Key Provisioning Software IP for IoT security. Hardware Root of Trust via unclonable device identities. Deploy any time in device lifecycle.

Mocana - Mocana’s comprehensive cybersecurity solutions are trusted to protect more than 100 million ICS and IoT devices.