Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Site Recovery VS Zerto

Compare Azure Site Recovery VS Zerto and see what are their differences

Azure Site Recovery logo Azure Site Recovery

Azure Site Recovery can protect Microsoft Hyper-V, VMware, and physical servers, and you can use Azure or your secondary datacenter as your recovery site.

Zerto logo Zerto

Virtual replication & recovery solution
  • Azure Site Recovery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-10
  • Zerto Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

Zerto

Website
zerto.com
Release Date
2009 January
Startup details
Country
United States
City
Boston
Founder(s)
Oded Kedem
Employees
500 - 999

Azure Site Recovery features and specs

  • Comprehensive Disaster Recovery
    Azure Site Recovery provides a robust disaster recovery solution that helps maintain business continuity by keeping your applications running during outages.
  • Platform Versatility
    Supports a wide range of platforms including VMware, Hyper-V, and physical servers, offering flexibility in adoption across different IT environments.
  • Integration with Microsoft Products
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services such as Azure Backup, Azure Virtual Machines, and broader Azure ecosystem enhances performance and capabilities.
  • Ease of Use
    Azure Site Recovery is relatively easy to set up and manage, especially for organizations already familiar with Azure services.
  • Automation Capabilities
    Supports automated failover and recovery testing, reducing the need for manual intervention and streamlining operations.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Site Recovery

  • Cost Considerations
    While Azure Site Recovery offers substantial benefits, it can become expensive, particularly for large-scale deployments or extensive use.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Understanding and predicting costs can be challenging due to Azure's pricing structure, which may complicate budget planning.
  • Learning Curve
    Organizations new to Azure might encounter a learning curve, needing time and resources to fully understand and effectively implement the service.
  • Internet Dependence
    Reliance on internet connectivity can be a drawback, especially in regions where internet infrastructure is not robust or reliable.
  • Potential Performance Impact
    During replication processes, there might be an impact on system performance, which needs to be managed through careful planning and resource allocation.

Zerto features and specs

  • Continuous Data Protection
    Zerto provides continuous data protection (CDP) with near-real-time replication, ensuring that data loss is minimized during recovery operations.
  • Unified Platform
    Zerto integrates disaster recovery, backup, and cloud mobility into a single, coherent platform, simplifying management and reducing the need for multiple tools.
  • Easy to Use
    Zerto's user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for IT administrators to manage and monitor disaster recovery tasks.
  • Rapid Recovery
    Zerto enables rapid recovery of applications and data with low recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs), reducing downtime.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to scale seamlessly from small environments to large enterprise deployments, accommodating growing businesses.
  • Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Support
    Zerto supports a variety of cloud environments, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering flexibility in deployment and management.

Possible disadvantages of Zerto

  • High Cost
    The cost of deploying and maintaining Zerto can be high, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
  • Complex Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of Zerto can be complex and time-consuming, potentially requiring dedicated resources and expertise.
  • Resource Intensive
    Zerto can be resource-intensive, requiring significant compute and storage resources, which might impact performance if not properly managed.
  • Limited Physical Server Support
    Zerto is primarily designed for virtualized environments and may have limited support for physical servers, which could be a drawback for organizations with mixed environments.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Zerto's platform can lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch to other solutions without significant effort and cost.

Azure Site Recovery videos

Zone to Zone Disaster Recovery with Azure Site Recovery | Azure Friday

More videos:

  • Review - Azure Migrate - #3 - Azure Site Recovery Single VM
  • Review - Azure (Beginners to Professional) Part-25, Azure Site Recovery Testing, VM Failover, Recovery

Zerto videos

Zerto 8: New Product Features and Updates

More videos:

  • Review - Zerto Architecture in AWS
  • Demo - How to Recover from Ransomware with Zerto - 5 min Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Site Recovery and Zerto)
Monitoring Tools
27 27%
73% 73
Backup And Disaster Recovery
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Site Recovery and Zerto. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Azure Site Recovery and Zerto

Azure Site Recovery Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Site Recovery yet.
Be the first one to post

Zerto Reviews

Veeam vs Zerto: Which Is Better?
Zerto claims that it can be implemented in as little as two hours. There are also Zerto professional service consultants who offer remote help to install Zerto Virtual Replication, with different levels of assistance available.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Site Recovery seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Site Recovery mentions (3)

  • A Step by Step Guide on How to Migrate from AWS to Azure
    During this, you will need to ensure continuous data synchronization. For this, You can use Azure Site Recovery for real-time replication of virtual machines and the Azure Database Migration Service (DMS) to move databases seamlessly. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Veeam, can I use it for Hyper-V replication to cloud for failover?
    You are better off using Azure Site Recovery. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • On Prem HyperV VM's to Azure (Immutable Storage with Versioning)
    I've not personally used it yet but I think you may want to look at Azure Site Recovery if you've not already. It should create a local VM on your Hyper-V server and replicate the VMs to azure. Source: over 3 years ago

Zerto mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Zerto yet. Tracking of Zerto recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Site Recovery and Zerto, you can also consider the following products

INAP Bare Metal - INAP Bare Metal is an intelligent monitoring service for bare metal dedicated and virtual servers.

CrashPlan - CrashPlan for Small Business backup software offers the best way to back up and store business & enterprise data securely - offsite, onsite & online in the Cloud.

Barracuda MSP - Barracuda MSP is the first and only MSP-focused provider of advanced threat protection with backup & disaster recovery - complete data protection for MSPs.

ManageWP - ManageWP is a service for bloggers, site owners and web based companies helping them manage multiple WordPress sites from one dashboard.

Acronis Disaster Recovery - Acronis Disaster Recovery Service is a comprehensive enterprise solution that integrates with IT to protect and restore data and servers. Learn more today!

Backblaze - Backblaze's remote backup automatically backs up your data to our secure datacenter.