Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Service Bus VS Apache Santuario

Compare Azure Service Bus VS Apache Santuario and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Azure Service Bus logo Azure Service Bus

Learn how to set up messaging that connects applications and services across on-premises and cloud environments. Tutorials, videos, API references, and more.

Apache Santuario logo Apache Santuario

Apache Santuario - Index
  • Azure Service Bus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20
  • Apache Santuario Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-08

Azure Service Bus features and specs

  • Reliable Messaging
    Azure Service Bus ensures reliable message delivery through features like message duplication detection, message sessions, and dead-letter queues, providing robust and durable message handling.
  • Scalability
    Service Bus is designed to handle high-throughput scenarios, making it suitable for applications that require scalable messaging across various workloads.
  • Message Security
    Service Bus provides secure messaging with options for transporting data over SSL and authorization mechanisms such as Shared Access Signature (SAS) and Azure Active Directory (AAD) integration.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Azure services and on-premises solutions, offering hybrid connections and seamless interaction with Azure Logic Apps, Azure Functions, and more.
  • Advanced Messaging Patterns
    Supports a variety of messaging patterns, including pub/sub and message sessions, which allow for complex workflows and inter-process communication.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Service Bus

  • Cost
    Depending on usage, costs can escalate, especially in scenarios requiring high throughput or long message retention, making budget management important.
  • Complexity
    Implementing and managing Service Bus can require significant understanding and expertise, particularly when dealing with advanced features like message sessions and transaction support.
  • Latency
    While generally fast, there can be latency issues depending on the configuration and geographical distribution of resources, impacting real-time applications.
  • Message Size Limit
    Service Bus imposes a size limit on messages (up to 256 KB for standard and 1 MB for premium), requiring message batching or segmentation for larger payloads.
  • Dependency on Azure
    As a fully managed service in Azure, uptime and performance depend heavily on Azure's reliability, which can be a concern for some critical applications.

Apache Santuario features and specs

  • Security
    Apache Santuario provides robust XML signature and encryption capabilities, enhancing the security of XML data transmission and storage.
  • Compatibility
    It adheres to W3C standards for XML encryption and signing, ensuring broad compatibility with other XML processing systems and applications.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project under the Apache Software Foundation, it allows for community-driven development and use without licensing fees.
  • Flexibility
    Supports a wide range of cryptographic algorithms and configurations, allowing developers to tailor its usage according to their specific security needs.
  • Integration
    Can be integrated into existing applications with relative ease, using its well-documented API.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Santuario

  • Complexity
    Setting up and correctly configuring XML signatures and encryption can be complex, requiring a good understanding of cryptographic concepts.
  • Performance Overheads
    The use of XML security can introduce performance overheads, as processing of XML signatures and encryption is computationally intensive.
  • Documentation
    While documentation exists, it may not always cover every use case comprehensively, requiring developers to seek additional help or resources.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with XML security standards or Apache Santuario might face a steep learning curve when starting out.
  • Community Support
    The community is smaller compared to more popular open-source projects, which might limit the availability of third-party resources and support.

Azure Service Bus videos

Understanding Azure Events and Messages: Azure Service Bus, Event Grids and Event Hubs

More videos:

  • Review - Day 25 - Azure Service Bus

Apache Santuario videos

No Apache Santuario videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Service Bus and Apache Santuario)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Service Bus and Apache Santuario. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Santuario seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Service Bus mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Azure Service Bus yet. Tracking of Azure Service Bus recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Santuario mentions (1)

  • Consuming SOAP and REST apis from my C++ application?
    I've just examined the structure of a standard SOAP package and yes - it looks easy as hell to build it myself. I already have tinyxml in my project, anyway. The only thing that leaves me in doubt is the xml signature. I am thinking about https://santuario.apache.org/ ? Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Service Bus and Apache Santuario, you can also consider the following products

IBM App Connect - IBM App Connect is the all-in-one integration tool for connecting apps, integrating data, building APIs and acting on events

Qizx - XML Databases

Apache Camel - Apache Camel is a versatile open-source integration framework based on known enterprise integration patterns.

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Software AG webMethods - Software AG’s webMethods enables you to quickly integrate systems, partners, data, devices and SaaS applications

Apache Xerces - Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.