Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication VS ASP.NET Identity

Compare Azure Multi-Factor Authentication VS ASP.NET Identity and see what are their differences

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.

ASP.NET Identity logo ASP.NET Identity

ASP.NET Identity is a membership-based software system designed for the authentication and authorization of the users via building an ASP.NET application.
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • ASP.NET Identity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

ASP.NET Identity features and specs

  • Integrated with ASP.NET Framework
    ASP.NET Identity is seamlessly integrated into the ASP.NET framework, making it easier to implement authentication and authorization in ASP.NET applications.
  • Supports Multiple Authentication Methods
    It supports various authentication methods, including two-factor authentication, social logins (such as Facebook, Google), and traditional username/password combinations.
  • Customizable
    Developers have the flexibility to customize the identity system according to their needs, for example, by extending user information and roles.
  • Role and Claim-based Authorization
    ASP.NET Identity supports role-based and claims-based authorization, allowing for fine-grained access control.
  • Entity Framework Integration
    Built with Entity Framework, making it easy to persist identity data in a database and leverage Entity Framework's capabilities for ORM.
  • Ease of Use
    Designed to be straightforward to set up and use, with many features working out of the box with minimal configuration.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET Identity

  • Complexity for Small Applications
    For small applications with simple authentication needs, ASP.NET Identity might be overly complex and result in unnecessary overhead.
  • Database Dependency
    The default setup requires a database to store user and role information, which may not be suitable for applications where a database-less solution is preferred.
  • Learning Curve
    There can be a learning curve for newcomers to fully understand its architecture and how to implement advanced features.
  • Performance Overhead
    The flexible and feature-rich design of ASP.NET Identity might introduce performance overhead, especially if not properly optimized.
  • Migration Challenges
    Migrating existing applications from older identity systems to ASP.NET Identity can be challenging and time-consuming.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

ASP.NET Identity videos

Understand ASP.NET Identity Core

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and ASP.NET Identity)
Identity And Access Management
Network & Admin
0 0%
100% 100
Two Factor Authentication
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and ASP.NET Identity. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

ASP.NET Identity mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ASP.NET Identity yet. Tracking of ASP.NET Identity recommendations started around Jul 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and ASP.NET Identity, you can also consider the following products

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

DotNetOpenAuth - DotNetOpenAuth is a free-to-use compiled library that comes with the real support to your site visitor to login with the help of openIDs via getting control of the ASP.NET control onto the page.

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

ASP.NET SAML - ASP.NET SAML is an open-source authentication utility that has been used for exchanging authentication and authorization data between the channels.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

BugMeNot - BugMeNot is a free Internet service that provides usernames and passwords to allow users to bypass the registration process for websites.