Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication VS Akamai Web Application Protector

Compare Azure Multi-Factor Authentication VS Akamai Web Application Protector and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.

Akamai Web Application Protector logo Akamai Web Application Protector

Web Application Protector is designed to safeguard web assets from web application and DDoS attacks, while improving performance.
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Akamai Web Application Protector Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

Akamai Web Application Protector features and specs

  • Comprehensive Threat Protection
    Akamai Web Application Protector provides robust protection against a wide range of web application threats, including SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and DDoS attacks, which helps in safeguarding applications from sophisticated attacks.
  • Easy Deployment and Management
    The solution is designed for ease of use, featuring a streamlined setup process and intuitive management interface that reduces the complexity and time associated with security configurations and monitoring.
  • Automatic Updates
    Akamai frequently updates its threat intelligence and security policies to provide automatic protection against emerging threats, ensuring that applications remain secure without requiring manual intervention.
  • Global Network
    Leveraging Akamai's extensive global CDN, the Web Application Protector benefits from enhanced performance and reliability, with low latency traffic routing and improved application delivery.

Possible disadvantages of Akamai Web Application Protector

  • Cost
    Pricing for Akamai's Web Application Protector can be high, especially for smaller businesses or startups, and may present a significant investment compared to other solutions.
  • Complexity for Small Businesses
    While the platform is user-friendly, its comprehensive features may still overwhelm small businesses with limited IT resources or security expertise.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users may find the level of customization options insufficient for highly specialized requirements or unique security policies, as the product is designed to be accessible and straightforward.
  • Dependence on Internet Reliability
    As a cloud-based service, the performance and effectiveness of the Web Application Protector are dependent on internet reliability, which could be a concern in regions with unstable connections.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Akamai Web Application Protector videos

No Akamai Web Application Protector videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and Akamai Web Application Protector)
Identity And Access Management
Web Application Security
0 0%
100% 100
Two Factor Authentication
Security Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and Akamai Web Application Protector. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

Akamai Web Application Protector mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Akamai Web Application Protector yet. Tracking of Akamai Web Application Protector recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and Akamai Web Application Protector, you can also consider the following products

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

AWS WAF - AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits.

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

ModSecurity - ModSecurity is an Open Source web application firewall developed by Trustwave's SpiderLabs.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

Cloudbric - Cloudbric is a website security program that aims to block cyber attacks on your site. Security programs like Cloudbric are important for any large sites or any sites that handle money or secure information. Read more about Cloudbric.