Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication VS Adaptive Security Manager

Compare Azure Multi-Factor Authentication VS Adaptive Security Manager and see what are their differences

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.

Adaptive Security Manager logo Adaptive Security Manager

Adaptive Security Manager is an Intelligent, affordable, adaptive multi-factor security for web applications.
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Adaptive Security Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-17

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

Adaptive Security Manager features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Adaptive Security Manager provides a layered security approach, offering more comprehensive protection against cyber threats by continuously monitoring and adjusting security measures.
  • Real-time Threat Detection
    The system is capable of identifying and responding to threats in real-time, reducing the risk of data breaches and minimizing potential damage.
  • Scalability
    It can be easily scaled to accommodate the growing and changing security needs of an organization, supporting various levels of security policies.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, allowing security teams to manage and monitor security settings efficiently.
  • Customizability
    Adaptive Security Manager allows for customization of security policies and configurations, enabling organizations to tailor the tool according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Adaptive Security Manager

  • Complex Implementation
    The initial setup and configuration of Adaptive Security Manager can be complex and time-consuming, requiring skilled IT staff to ensure successful deployment.
  • Resource Intensive
    The system may require significant IT resources and infrastructure to operate optimally, which can be a limitation for smaller organizations.
  • Cost
    Depending on the scale of deployment, the cost of implementing and maintaining Adaptive Security Manager can be high, potentially limiting access for small and medium enterprises.
  • Learning Curve
    Security teams may experience a learning curve when adopting the software, necessitating training and potentially increasing the time required to become fully operational.
  • Potential Overhead
    The continuous monitoring and adaptation functions may lead to increased system overhead, impacting IT performance if not properly managed.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Adaptive Security Manager videos

No Adaptive Security Manager videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and Adaptive Security Manager)
Identity And Access Management
Two Factor Authentication
Authentication
91 91%
9% 9
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and Adaptive Security Manager. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

Adaptive Security Manager mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Adaptive Security Manager yet. Tracking of Adaptive Security Manager recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and Adaptive Security Manager, you can also consider the following products

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication - Multi-factor authentication is becoming the standard. Secure your apps and VPN with strong MFA for adaptive, risk-based authentication.

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

DIGIPASS - DIGIPASS offers two-factor​ authentication solutions for mobile applications.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

Microsoft Authenticator - One app to quickly and securely verify your identity online, for all of your accounts.