Azure Functions VS Phabricator

This article shows with the simple example how to manage Java-based serverless APIs build with Azure functions. It uses azure-functions plugin to integrate Apache APISIX API Gateway with Azure Serverless Function that invokes the HTTP trigger functions and return the response from Azure Cloud. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

GitHub Actions for Azure: This GitHub Action allows developers to automate tasks on the Microsoft Azure platform. With this action, developers can easily integrate Azure services into their workflows, such as Azure Functions, App Services, and Kubernetes. This can help streamline DevOps workflows by automating tasks such as deployment, testing, and scaling on the Azure platform. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

NoOps is best suited for born-in-the-cloud environments that leverage PaaS and serverless solutions. Microservices and API-based application architectures fit the bill perfectly, as they offer fine-grained modularity along with automation. Leading cloud service providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP have a laser focus on providing more services and capabilities in PaaS and serverless, which would help accelerate the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

My company has used Phabricator, which is an alternative to Azure Devops, for about 5 years. A few days ago they announced that the project won't be maintained anymore, so we are looking into alternatives. We have around 50 devs+product folks that use Phabricator at the moment. Source: almost 3 years ago

You also mention Gitlab is close to what you would like - maybe Phabricator is even closer: https://phacility.com/phabricator/. Source: about 3 years ago

Https://phacility.com/phabricator/ I think checks most of those boxes, maybe all. Source: about 3 years ago