Ayoa VS Apache Camel

Ayoa Reviews

1. Tim Smith    

   over 3 years ago
   A great visual way to work

   Ayoa is like a combination of Slack, Miro and Trello in a single app. I love to work visually and with the mind mapping, combined with very visual task management (especially the canvas view), it is a nice way to work for me and the team. I can't wait for the new whiteboard view that Ayoa is releasing soon.....

   🏁 Competitors: MindMeister, Miro, Mural, Trello

   👍 Pros:    Great way to build ideas with a team|Mind mapping allows us to grow the ideas|Ideas can then be turned into tasks and managed all within one app

   👎 Cons:    Can't wait until ayoa release their virtual whiteboard (november 2020)|No integration with slack
2. Sunggi    

   over 3 years ago
   Enjoy work

   I'm using Ayoa at work. After using Ayoa, it became possible to share the work of team members in real time. As a result, unnecessary or repetitive communication has been reduced. And Ayoa includes most of the functions needed for collaboration, such as Project Management, Gantt chart, Calendar, Mindmap, Brainstorm and Video Meeting. You can do most of the work within Ayoa without the need for multiple applications. Above all, Ayoa is able to share parts with the entire, playing a guiding role in achieving the team's goals.

   👍 Pros:    No installation|Any time access|Many features|Visual
3. Daniel Perdigão    

   CEO at UpSideUp | over 3 years ago
   A real Swiss knife

   AYOA is the evolution of iMindMap and now it is so much more. I am amazed by what this app can do! We can still do mindmaps, and we can have task management and project management! We can collaborate with colleagues and with our team members! And it all is perfectly integrated! And I know what's coming: videoconference and whiteboard! Then AYOA will be not only super but unbeatable! I manage many aspects of my business on AYOA and I recommend you give it a try!

   👍 Pros:    Flexible|Integrated|Collaborative|Innovative|Visual|Fun

   👎 Cons:    Always evolving

Apache Camel Reviews

Ayoa mentions (0)

Apache Camel mentions (12)

• Ask HN: What is the correct way to deal with pipelines?

  "correct" is a value judgement that depends on lots of different things. Only you can decide which tool is correct. Here are some ideas: - https://camel.apache.org/ - https://www.windmill.dev/ Your idea about a queue (in redis, or postgres, or sqlite, etc) is also totally valid. These off-the-shelf tools I listed probably wouldn't give you a huge advantage IMO. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Why messaging is much better than REST for inter-microservice communications

  This reminds me more of Apache Camel[0] than other things it's being compared to. > The process initiator puts a message on a queue, and another processor picks that up (probably on a different service, on a different host, and in different code base) - does some processing, and puts its (intermediate) result on another queue This is almost exactly the definition of message routing (ie: Camel). I'm a bit doubtful... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Can I continuously write to a CSV file with a python script while a Java application is continuously reading from it?

  Since you're writing a Java app to consume this, I highly recommend Apache Camel to do the consuming of messages for it. You can trivially aim it at file systems, message queues, databases, web services and all manner of other sources to grab your data for you, and you can change your mind about what that source is, without having to rewrite most of your client code. Source: over 1 year ago

• S3 to S3 transform

  For a simple sequential Pipeline, my goto would be Apache Camel. As soon as you want complexity its either Apache Nifi or a micro service architecture. Source: over 1 year ago

• 🗞️ We have just released our JBang! catalog 🛍️

  🐪 Apache Camel : Camel JBang, A JBang-based Camel app for easily running Camel routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago