Based on our record, AWS WAF should be more popular than Keycloak. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If you aren't using API Gateway (REST API to be specific) your options are a bit more limited. You can get some benefit from WAF, though it's not really designed to be tenant-based. Still, it can help. Beyond that, you're mostly on your own. Keep in mind that anything you implement in your code is already sharing some amount of resources. Let's just hope AWS decides to add it to other places, like AppSync, in the... - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
WAF is a Web Application Firewall, which allows the inspection of HTTP requests. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Add a firewall and other mechanisms for protecting your endpoints against malicious traffic and bots before it hits your workload and consumes those precious worker threads (e.g.: WAF). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
AWS WAF: The AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Security and secrets management - Experience with tools like AWS Secrets Manager, AWS Key Management Service (KMS), AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) for secure secrets management and overall system security adds an extra layer of expertise to the QA Engineer's skill set. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: about 1 year ago
A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
Let's Encrypt - Let’s Encrypt is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).
Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
Sqreen - Sqreen is a web application security monitoring and protection solution helping companies protect their apps and users from attacks. Get started in minutes.
OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more