Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS Transfer for SFTP VS MySql Backup FTP

Compare AWS Transfer for SFTP VS MySql Backup FTP and see what are their differences

AWS Transfer for SFTP logo AWS Transfer for SFTP

AWS Transfer for SFTP (AWS SFTP), is a fully managed service hosted in AWS that enables transfer of files over the Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol directly in and out of Amazon S3.

MySql Backup FTP logo MySql Backup FTP

MySQL Backups made easy. Encryption, Compression, Scheduling, Email notifications, Sending to Folder, FTP or Cloud
  • AWS Transfer for SFTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-08
  • MySql Backup FTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-06

AWS Transfer for SFTP features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS Transfer for SFTP automatically scales to accommodate the traffic without the need for manual intervention, ensuring consistent performance regardless of demand spikes.
  • Fully Managed
    Being a fully managed service, AWS Transfer for SFTP reduces the operational overhead by handling routine tasks such as server maintenance, backups, and patching.
  • Security
    Supports multiple layers of security, including VPC integration, AWS IAM policies, and encryption for data at rest and in transit, ensuring that data transfer is secure.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    Natively integrates with other AWS services, allowing for seamless workflows with services like S3, CloudWatch, and Lambda.
  • Compliance
    Helps meet compliance requirements as it adheres to various standards and certifications like HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO.
  • Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
    Offers cost-effective usage-based pricing, allowing businesses to pay only for the resources they use.
  • Ease of Migration
    Simplifies the migration process with minimal disruption to existing systems, supporting both file-based and external server migration.
  • Availability
    Ensures high availability and fault tolerance by distributing workloads across multiple regions.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Transfer for SFTP

  • Cost
    Despite its pay-as-you-go pricing model, the costs can add up for high-volume usage, making it expensive for some use cases.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    While it’s user-friendly for experienced AWS users, beginners may find the initial setup and configuration challenging due to the myriad of options and settings.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Supports only SFTP, FTPS, and FTP; lacks support for other file transfer protocols, potentially restricting its usage scenarios.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using AWS Transfer for SFTP ties you to the AWS ecosystem, which may make it difficult to switch to a different provider in the future without considerable effort.
  • Latency
    Some users may experience latency issues, particularly if they are geographically far from the AWS regions hosting their services.

MySql Backup FTP features and specs

  • Automated Backups
    MySql Backup FTP allows for scheduled automatic backups, reducing the need for manual intervention and ensuring that database backups are consistently up-to-date.
  • Ease of Use
    The software provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the setup and management of backups, making it accessible even for users with less technical expertise.
  • Multiple Storage Options
    It supports various storage options such as FTP, cloud services (like Google Drive, Dropbox), and local/network folders, offering flexibility in choosing a backup destination.
  • Email Notifications
    The system can send email alerts to inform users about the status of backup operations, helping them stay informed without manually checking.
  • Compression and Encryption
    Backups can be compressed and encrypted, reducing storage requirements and enhancing data security during transfer and storage.

Possible disadvantages of MySql Backup FTP

  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of MySql Backup FTP comes with limited features, which may not be sufficient for large databases or professional requirements.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Tools
    For some of its functions, such as SSH, the tool may rely on third-party applications, which could add complexity to the setup process.
  • Performance Impact
    Running backups, especially for large databases, can have a noticeable impact on server performance during the backup process.
  • Customization Limitations
    While easy to use, the software may lack advanced customization options that larger, more complex environments require.
  • Support Limitations
    The level of customer support might not match that of larger, more expensive enterprise solutions, potentially leading to delays in issue resolution.

AWS Transfer for SFTP videos

AWS Transfer for SFTP to S3 | Fully Managed SFTP Service | How to set up SFTP to upload files to S3

MySql Backup FTP videos

No MySql Backup FTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS Transfer for SFTP and MySql Backup FTP)
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
File Transfer
78 78%
22% 22
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
SFTP Client
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS Transfer for SFTP and MySql Backup FTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS Transfer for SFTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS Transfer for SFTP mentions (7)

  • What is the easiest way to get Python code running on AWS?
    It is not clear the use case. However, if you want to run a FTP server with capabilities to run python scripts, for example, when files arrive… I recommend evaluate AWS Transfer Family leveraging the managed workflow capabilities. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Event-Driven Serverless Data Architecture
    S3/Transfer - Doesn't matter what you work on, it's hard to get away from file-based transfers and S3 and AWS Transfer are great choices for that. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Is there a preferred SFTP tool in this reddit to receive SFTPs?
    Are you in AWS? They have a managed SFTP service. https://aws.amazon.com/aws-transfer-family/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Upload fortigate gate config directly to s3, possible?
    I bet you could use aws transfer https://aws.amazon.com/aws-transfer-family/. There is a hourly charge so I would setup a small linux server with s3fs but that's me. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Aws internet line
    Are you saying you’re using AWS Transfer Family? Source: over 3 years ago
View more

MySql Backup FTP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MySql Backup FTP yet. Tracking of MySql Backup FTP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS Transfer for SFTP and MySql Backup FTP, you can also consider the following products

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.

ShareFile - Secure file sharing and sync

Cerberus FTP Server - Cerberus FTP Server Enterprise is a professional FTP server that supports encrypted FTPS and SFTP sessions as well as HTTP and HTTPS file...

FileZilla - FileZilla is an FTP, or file transfer protocol, client. It lets individuals transfer single files or batches to a web server. For many years, FTP was the standard for website design. Read more about FileZilla.

GlobalSCAPE Enhanced File Transfer - With operational efficiency in mind, Globalscape’s Enhanced File Transfer™ (EFT™) Enterprise features quick and intuitive setup, advanced automation capabilities, real-time visibility into data transfers, and much more.

WinSCP - WinSCP is an open source free SFTP client and FTP client for Windows.