Based on our record, AWS Organizations should be more popular than Hangfire. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If you are working in a multi-account setup which should be the case if you run more than one workload in more than one SDLC stage, it is a best practice to use AWS Organizations to govern and manage your AWS accounts. Going further into the best practices, it is a a recommendation to have a separate Security or Audit AWS Account to manage your security services on the organizational scale. In that case, you... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
The solution here requires you to be using AWS Organizations to create AWS accounts for your developers. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
At this scale, operations can take a lot of time, because there are multiple operational tasks that we need to do when AWS accounts are leaving the AWS Organization or Teams are nuking the AWS account, StackSets Instances get drifted, because not all required resources for compliance can be secured ( SCP Limitations ), existing AWS accounts are joining the AWS Organization and all mandatory StackSets needs to be... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
AWS Organizations. (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2023, from https://aws.amazon.com/organizations/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
No doubt about it, AWS SSO (or should I say IAM Identity Centre?) is a great addition to the overall access management and security in AWS. But, as you mature in the cloud with a touch of AWS Organizations and dash of well-architected framework you'll soon have many AWS accounts and managing all of those accounts kind of sucks. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Hangfire (https://hangfire.io) includes default exception handling and is very extensible, I think it's a good mid-level choice and a good alternative to other queue mechanism, if you can't afford to host a separated queue service or can't manage a separated service; also scales pretty well (you can have multiple servers handling the same background job queue, or different queues). It runs on Sql Server and MySql... Source: almost 2 years ago
I used to just use hangfire.io in .net and worked wonderfully for any long running tasks or schedules. Had a great queuing system, UI to know if they failed , etc. That's how I'd send emails, pdf's, and other things along that nature. Then if it were more just a db related operation, just setup a schedule in mssql job service. Source: almost 2 years ago
You can use hangfire for cronjob, to run at a time in future, you can use Hangfire.Schedule(jobid, datetime). Source: almost 2 years ago
So another option is to use something like https://hangfire.io to pull the jobs and process them? Source: about 2 years ago
I've got a fairly large process I need to handle in background on my .net core web app so I've exported it to a background task using Hangfire. Source: almost 3 years ago
IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.
Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby
RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.
Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.