Based on our record, AWS IoT should be more popular than Spark Streaming. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In this blog post series, we will look at a simple example of modeling an IoT device process as a workflow, using primarily AWS IoT and AWS Step Functions. Our example is a system where, when a device comes online, you need to get external settings based on the profile of the user the device belongs to and push that configuration to the device. The system that holds the external settings is often a third party... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Iot - MQTT broker to send messages to the Raspberry Pi. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
" Amazon Web Services offers a broad set of global cloud-based products including compute, storage, databases, analytics, networking, mobile, developer tools, management tools, IoT, security and enterprise applications. These services help organizations move faster, lower IT costs, and scale. AWS is trusted by the largest enterprises and the hottest start-ups to power a wide variety of workloads including: web and... Source: over 3 years ago
AWS IoT Core - message broker between all devices and AWS. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
If you have to ask, then you should be using AWS by default. They have plenty of IoT services for you to fiddle around with and get started. Source: almost 4 years ago
The last decade saw the rise of open-source frameworks like Apache Flink, Spark Streaming, and Apache Samza. These offered more flexibility but still demanded significant engineering muscle to run effectively at scale. Companies using them often needed specialized stream processing engineers just to manage internal state, tune performance, and handle the day-to-day operational challenges. The barrier to entry... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Apache Spark Streaming: Offers micro-batch processing, suitable for high-throughput scenarios that can tolerate slightly higher latency. https://spark.apache.org/streaming/. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Other stream processing engines (such as Flink and Spark Streaming) provide SQL interfaces too, but the key difference is a streaming database has its storage. Stream processing engines require a dedicated database to store input and output data. On the other hand, streaming databases utilize cloud-native storage to maintain materialized views and states, allowing data replication and independent storage scaling. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Spark Streaming: The component for real-time data processing and analytics. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Is a big data framework and currently one of the most popular tools for big data analytics. It contains libraries for data analysis, machine learning, graph analysis and streaming live data. In general Spark is faster than Hadoop, as it does not write intermediate results to disk. It is not a data storage system. We can use Spark on top of HDFS or read data from other sources like Amazon S3. It is the designed... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Particle.io - Particle is an IoT platform enabling businesses to build, connect and manage their connected solutions.
Confluent - Confluent offers a real-time data platform built around Apache Kafka.
ThingSpeak - Open source data platform for the Internet of Things. ThingSpeak Features
Google Cloud Dataflow - Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully-managed cloud service and programming model for batch and streaming big data processing.
Blynk.io - We make internet of things simple
Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.