Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AWS IoT VS Apache Ignite

Compare AWS IoT VS Apache Ignite and see what are their differences

Draxlr
Turn SQL Data into Decisions. Build professional dashboards and data visualizations without technical expertise. Easily embed analytics anywhere, receive automated alerts, and discover AI-powered insights all through a straightforward interface. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

AWS IoT logo AWS IoT

Easily and securely connect devices to the cloud.

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...
  • AWS IoT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-28
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08

AWS IoT features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS IoT offers seamless scaling options to handle millions of devices and messages, allowing businesses to grow without worrying about infrastructure limitations.
  • Integration
    AWS IoT integrates effortlessly with other AWS services, such as AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, and Amazon DynamoDB, enabling a unified ecosystem for data processing and storage.
  • Security
    AWS IoT provides multiple layers of security, including device authentication and end-to-end encryption, to protect data and ensure secure communication between devices and the cloud.
  • Flexibility
    AWS IoT supports multiple communication protocols like MQTT, HTTP, and WebSockets, making it adaptable to a wide range of IoT devices and use cases.
  • Device Management
    AWS IoT includes features for managing and monitoring devices throughout their lifecycle, such as device registration, software updates, and diagnostics.
  • Analytics
    AWS IoT provides powerful analytics tools to process and analyze data from IoT devices, helping businesses gain valuable insights.

Possible disadvantages of AWS IoT

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing an AWS IoT environment can be complex and may require a steep learning curve, especially for those new to IoT or AWS services.
  • Cost
    While AWS IoT offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, costs can accumulate quickly, especially for large-scale deployments, making it potentially expensive for some businesses.
  • Internet Dependency
    AWS IoT relies heavily on stable internet connections for device communication, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Using AWS IoT tightly integrates your IoT solutions with AWS infrastructure, which can make it difficult and costly to switch to other platforms or cloud providers later on.
  • Configuration Overhead
    The wide range of customization options and configurations can be overwhelming and may require dedicated resources to manage effectively.

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

AWS IoT videos

+ Add

What is AWS IoT?

More videos:

  • Review - Introducción a AWS IoT
  • Review - AWS IoT in the Connected Home - AWS Online Tech Talks

Apache Ignite videos

+ Add

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS IoT and Apache Ignite)

AWS IoT

Apache Ignite

Data Dashboard
100 100%
Data Dashboard
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
Databases
100% 100
IoT Platform
100 100%
IoT Platform
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
NoSQL Databases
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS IoT and Apache Ignite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS IoT should be more popular than Apache Ignite. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS IoT mentions (8)

  • Automatically Applying Configuration to IoT Devices with AWS IoT and AWS Step Functions - Part 1
    In this blog post series, we will look at a simple example of modeling an IoT device process as a workflow, using primarily AWS IoT and AWS Step Functions. Our example is a system where, when a device comes online, you need to get external settings based on the profile of the user the device belongs to and push that configuration to the device. The system that holds the external settings is often a third party... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Building a serverless talking doorbell
    Iot - MQTT broker to send messages to the Raspberry Pi. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • GME NFT/blockchain is not to be a stock market...it's bigger
    " Amazon Web Services offers a broad set of global cloud-based products including compute, storage, databases, analytics, networking, mobile, developer tools, management tools, IoT, security and enterprise applications. These services help organizations move faster, lower IT costs, and scale. AWS is trusted by the largest enterprises and the hottest start-ups to power a wide variety of workloads including: web and... Source: over 3 years ago
  • What is AWS IoT Core and how do I use it?
    AWS IoT Core - message broker between all devices and AWS. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Which Cloud Suite is preferable when the focus is more towards IoT/IIoT as potential future job search keyword?
    If you have to ask, then you should be using AWS by default. They have plenty of IoT services for you to fiddle around with and get started. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS IoT and Apache Ignite, you can also consider the following products

Particle.io - Particle is an IoT platform enabling businesses to build, connect and manage their connected solutions.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Blynk.io - We make internet of things simple

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

ThingSpeak - Open source data platform for the Internet of Things. ThingSpeak Features

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Loading...