Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS IoT Analytics VS memcached

Compare AWS IoT Analytics VS memcached and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

AWS IoT Analytics logo AWS IoT Analytics

IoT Management

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system
  • AWS IoT Analytics Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05
  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

AWS IoT Analytics features and specs

  • Scalable
    AWS IoT Analytics automatically scales to support large volumes of IoT data, accommodating billions of messages from millions of devices without the need for extensive infrastructure management.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, and Amazon QuickSight for extended functionality and complete data processing and visualization workflows.
  • Time-series analysis
    Designed specifically to handle time-series data, providing tools and pre-built functions to analyze and visualize trends over time, which is crucial for monitoring IoT devices.
  • Data Enrichment
    Enables the enrichment of IoT data by integrating external data sources and using metadata, allowing for more contextual and meaningful data insights.
  • Machine Learning Support
    Supports integration with AWS's machine learning services, allowing users to build, train, and deploy models for predictive analysis directly on their IoT data.

Possible disadvantages of AWS IoT Analytics

  • Complexity
    The broad feature set and integration options can lead to a steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with AWS services and IoT analytics workflows.
  • Cost
    While offering extensive capabilities, the cost of using AWS IoT Analytics can become significant, especially as data volumes and processing needs increase.
  • Dependency on AWS Ecosystem
    Requires reliance on the AWS ecosystem, which can be a limitation for organizations using multi-cloud strategies or those wanting to maintain vendor neutrality.
  • Latency
    Although designed for handling IoT data, there can be latency issues in data processing and analysis, especially with high-frequency data ingestion.
  • Security Complexity
    Managing security and ensuring compliance can be complex due to the sensitive nature of IoT data and the need to configure various AWS security settings properly.

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

AWS IoT Analytics videos

AWS IoT Analytics - How It Works

More videos:

  • Review - Learn Step by Step How iDevices Uses AWS IoT Analytics - AWS Online Tech Talks

memcached videos

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS IoT Analytics and memcached)
Analytics
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Data Dashboard
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS IoT Analytics and memcached. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS IoT Analytics and memcached

AWS IoT Analytics Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS IoT Analytics yet.
Be the first one to post

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I don’t see “some” of the other offering out there like MemCached… what was the criteria used to select these? I don’t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storage Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, memcached seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS IoT Analytics mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AWS IoT Analytics yet. Tracking of AWS IoT Analytics recommendations started around Mar 2021.

memcached mentions (36)

  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached — Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • story of upgrading rails 5.x to 7.x
    The app depends on several packages to run, so I need to install them locally too. I used a combination of brew and orbstack / docker for installing packages. Some dependencies for this project are redis, mongodb and memcache. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS IoT Analytics and memcached, you can also consider the following products

ThingSpeak - Open source data platform for the Internet of Things. ThingSpeak Features

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Countly - Product Analytics and Innovation. Build better customer journeys.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Azure IoT Hub - Manage billions of IoT devices with Azure IoT Hub, a cloud platform that lets you easily connect, monitor, provision, and configure IoT devices.

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.