Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS IoT Analytics VS AWS Greengrass

Compare AWS IoT Analytics VS AWS Greengrass and see what are their differences

AWS IoT Analytics logo AWS IoT Analytics

IoT Management

AWS Greengrass logo AWS Greengrass

Local compute, messaging, data caching, and synch capabilities for connected devices
  • AWS IoT Analytics Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05
  • AWS Greengrass Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-28

AWS IoT Analytics features and specs

  • Scalable
    AWS IoT Analytics automatically scales to support large volumes of IoT data, accommodating billions of messages from millions of devices without the need for extensive infrastructure management.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, and Amazon QuickSight for extended functionality and complete data processing and visualization workflows.
  • Time-series analysis
    Designed specifically to handle time-series data, providing tools and pre-built functions to analyze and visualize trends over time, which is crucial for monitoring IoT devices.
  • Data Enrichment
    Enables the enrichment of IoT data by integrating external data sources and using metadata, allowing for more contextual and meaningful data insights.
  • Machine Learning Support
    Supports integration with AWS's machine learning services, allowing users to build, train, and deploy models for predictive analysis directly on their IoT data.

Possible disadvantages of AWS IoT Analytics

  • Complexity
    The broad feature set and integration options can lead to a steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with AWS services and IoT analytics workflows.
  • Cost
    While offering extensive capabilities, the cost of using AWS IoT Analytics can become significant, especially as data volumes and processing needs increase.
  • Dependency on AWS Ecosystem
    Requires reliance on the AWS ecosystem, which can be a limitation for organizations using multi-cloud strategies or those wanting to maintain vendor neutrality.
  • Latency
    Although designed for handling IoT data, there can be latency issues in data processing and analysis, especially with high-frequency data ingestion.
  • Security Complexity
    Managing security and ensuring compliance can be complex due to the sensitive nature of IoT data and the need to configure various AWS security settings properly.

AWS Greengrass features and specs

  • Edge Computing
    AWS Greengrass allows devices to process data locally without relying on cloud resources, reducing latency and ensuring continued operation even with intermittent connectivity.
  • Seamless AWS Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with a variety of AWS services such as AWS Lambda, AWS IoT Core, and Amazon S3, allowing for enhanced functionality and simplified data exchange between edge devices and the cloud.
  • Security Features
    Offers robust security features, including data encryption for both in-transit and at-rest data, ensuring secure communication and data storage.
  • OTA Updates
    Provides over-the-air software updates, allowing developers to deploy new updates and patches to edge devices securely and efficiently.
  • Machine Learning at the Edge
    Supports ML inference capabilities, enabling machine learning models to run locally on devices, which is essential for real-time data processing and decision-making.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Greengrass

  • Complexity
    The integration of Greengrass in IoT solutions can add complexity, requiring a good understanding of both AWS services and edge computing.
  • Cost Considerations
    While processing data locally can reduce cloud costs, there may be additional expenses related to maintaining the hardware and ensuring compatibility with Greengrass, as well as costs associated with AWS usage.
  • Device Compatibility
    Not all devices may be compatible with AWS Greengrass, which may limit its use cases or require specific hardware configurations.
  • Dependency on AWS Ecosystem
    Being heavily integrated with the AWS ecosystem means that changes or outages in AWS services can potentially impact Greengrass deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    There may be a steep learning curve for developers who are new to AWS Greengrass, especially when it comes to deploying and managing complex IoT applications.

AWS IoT Analytics videos

AWS IoT Analytics - How It Works

More videos:

  • Review - Learn Step by Step How iDevices Uses AWS IoT Analytics - AWS Online Tech Talks

AWS Greengrass videos

Run ML Models at the Edge with AWS Greengrass ML

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS IoT Analytics and AWS Greengrass)
Analytics
72 72%
28% 28
Data Dashboard
52 52%
48% 48
IoT Platform
54 54%
46% 46
IoT
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS IoT Analytics and AWS Greengrass. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS Greengrass seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS IoT Analytics mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AWS IoT Analytics yet. Tracking of AWS IoT Analytics recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AWS Greengrass mentions (5)

  • Orchestrating Application Workloads in Distributed Embedded Systems: Setting up a Nomad Cluster with AWS IoT Greengrass - Part 1
    In this blog post series, we will demonstrate how to use AWS IoT Greengrass and Hashicorp Nomad to seamlessly interface with multiple interconnected devices and orchestrate service deployments on them. Greengrass will allow us to view the cluster as a single "Thing" from the cloud perspective, while Nomad will serve as the primary cluster orchestration tool. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • AWS Summit 2022 Australia and New Zealand - Day 2, AI/ML Edition
    AWS IoT Greengrass allows one to manage their IOT Edge devices, download ML models locally, so that inference can then be also be done locally. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • Applying DevOps Principles to Robotics
    To assist in deployment and management of workloads in your fleet, it's worth taking advantage of a fleet or device management tool such as AWS GreenGrass, Formant or Rocos. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Machine Learning Best Practices for Public Sector Organizations
    In some cases, such as with edge devices, inferencing needs to occur even when there is limited or no connectivity to the cloud. Mining fields are an example of this type of use case. AWS IoT Greengrass enables ML inference locally using models that are created, trained, and optimized in the cloud using Amazon SageMaker, AWS Deep Learning AMI, or AWS Deep Learning Containers, and deployed on the edge devices. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Looking for a good IoT overview + a simple tutorial
    Take a look at Greengrass https://aws.amazon.com/greengrass/ Enables OTA updates and fleet management. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS IoT Analytics and AWS Greengrass, you can also consider the following products

ThingSpeak - Open source data platform for the Internet of Things. ThingSpeak Features

Particle.io - Particle is an IoT platform enabling businesses to build, connect and manage their connected solutions.

Countly - Product Analytics and Innovation. Build better customer journeys.

AWS IoT - Easily and securely connect devices to the cloud.

Azure IoT Hub - Manage billions of IoT devices with Azure IoT Hub, a cloud platform that lets you easily connect, monitor, provision, and configure IoT devices.

Axonize - Axonize IoT platform - the smarter way to truly realize your IoT potential and create smart, scalable IoT projects to increase profitability.