Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AWS Elastic Load Balancing VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare AWS Elastic Load Balancing VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

AWS Elastic Load Balancing logo AWS Elastic Load Balancing

Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
  • AWS Elastic Load Balancing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

AWS Elastic Load Balancing features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS Elastic Load Balancing can automatically distribute incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses, promoting application elasticity.
  • Health Monitoring
    It continually checks the health of the registered targets, ensuring that traffic is routed only to healthy instances.
  • Security
    Integrated with AWS's Certificate Manager and Application Load Balancer, allowing easy deployment of SSL/TLS for secure communication.
  • Flexibility
    Supports various types of load balancers: Application, Network, and Classic, each suited to different types of application architectures and requirements.
  • Cost-effective
    Pay-as-you-go pricing model ensures you only pay for the resources you use, which can lead to cost savings compared to a fixed-cost solution.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as Auto Scaling, Route 53, CloudWatch, and more for a more robust solution.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Elastic Load Balancing

  • Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for users unfamiliar with AWS services and cloud architecture.
  • Cost
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, the charges can ramp up quickly, especially for high-traffic applications.
  • Dependence on AWS Ecosystem
    Highly integrated with AWS services, making it less ideal for multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environments.
  • Latency
    In some cases, the load balancer can introduce a slight increase in latency, which might be a concern for latency-sensitive applications.
  • Configuration Limitations
    Some specific configurations and customizations may not be possible, leading to constraints on certain types of applications.

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Analysis of AWS Elastic Load Balancing

Overall verdict

  • AWS Elastic Load Balancing is generally considered a good choice for managing traffic distribution in cloud-based applications. Its integration with other AWS services, reliability, and ability to handle varying workloads make it a strong contender for enterprises leveraging Amazon Web Services.

Why this product is good

  • AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) is widely regarded as effective because it provides automated distribution of incoming application or network traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses. This helps improve the availability and fault tolerance of applications. ELB supports dynamic scaling, which means it can automatically adjust to handle spikes in traffic. Additionally, it is integrated with AWS services, providing a seamless experience for users already within the AWS ecosystem.

Recommended for

    AWS Elastic Load Balancing is recommended for businesses and developers who are operating in the AWS ecosystem and require reliable load balancing solutions for their applications. It's especially beneficial for those needing to manage traffic across multiple applications and services, and for organizations looking for scalability and integration with AWS tools.

Analysis of Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Apache ActiveMQ)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing

Apache ActiveMQ

Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
Data Integration
100% 100
Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Apache ActiveMQ

AWS Elastic Load Balancing Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS Elastic Load Balancing yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...
Source: www.spec-india.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS Elastic Load Balancing should be more popular than Apache ActiveMQ. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing mentions (25)

  • Basic AWS Elastic Load Balancer Setup
    Load balancers can be categorized to different types depending on their use cases. On a broader classification, we can divide load balancers into three different categories based on how they are deployed. 1. Hardware load balancers - Dedicated physical appliances designed for high-performance traffic distribution. They are often used by large scale enterprises and data centers that require minimum latency and... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Work Stealing: Load-balancing for compute-heavy tasks
    When a backend starts or stops, something needs to update, whether it’s Consul, kube-proxy, ELB, or otherwise. To stop a worker without incurring failures, you need to prevent the load balancer from sending new requests and then finishing existing ones. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Load Balancers in AWS
    In this way, you can create a load balancer and custom rules using AWS Elastic Load Balancer. You can refer the official user guide to learn more about load balancing in AWS. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • A Ride Through Optimising Legacy Spring Boot Services For High Throughput
    Use load balancers and distribute load accordingly to your redundant spring boot services. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DevSecOps with AWS- Ephemeral Environments – Creating test Environments On-Demand - Part 1
    • Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a fully managed container orchestration service that helps you easily deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications. • AWS Fargate is a serverless, pay-as-you-go compute engine that lets you focus on building applications without managing servers. AWS Fargate is compatible with both Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and Amazon Elastic... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Traefik - Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Loading...