AWS CodeBuild VS Pulumi

Therefore, I used AWS Codebuild and AWS CodePipeline to automate the steps of building and deploying the services. The diagram below depicts all the steps required to continuously deliver the frontend and backend applications:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

We treat these services in one  group as they belong together from a strategic point of view. They have been around for a few years and the teams that built these are now involved in CodeCatalyst. CodeCatalyst partly uses them “under the hood”. CodeCommit is a managed git hosting, CodeBuild is a managed “build” system, CodeStar is a “project management” tool. CodePipeline allows combining multiple CodeBuild steps... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Design for Operations You should implement your entire workload as code. The benefit is that you can apply the same engineering discipline that you use for application code to your infrastructure. Use version control system like AWS Codecommit to enable tracking of changes and releases, and use AWS Cloudformation for your infrastructure templates. It is recommendable to test and validate changes to help limit... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

AWS CodeBuild: fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

AWS CodeBuild is a completely managed service for compiling code, testing quality assurance using automated procedures, and generating software ready for deployment. CodeBuild is incredibly secure, as each client receives a unique set of encryption keys to include in each created artifact. Source: almost 2 years ago

Lang="en"> charset="utf-8"> Hello, world! Hello, world! 👋 Deployed with 💜 by new href="https://pulumi.com/">Pulumi. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

Pulumi IaC will help us bring up our infrastructure on the AWS Cloud. Check out pulumi.com if you still need to become familiar with it. You can deploy this demo stack using the Pulumi button below. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

There are other infrastructure as code tools that take secrets seriously. Pulumi encrypts all values in state and you can even bring your own key from your cloud provider. Source: over 1 year ago

*Codifying the deployment of the OTel Collector *(to Nomad, Kubernetes, or a VM) using tools such as Terraform, Pulumi, or Ansible. The Collector funnels your OTel data to your Observability back-end. ✅. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

It takes too much time, terraform configs are not easy to use also. Pulumi is much better to maintenance. Cloudy is good enough for launching a production-ready cluster in 5-10 minutes. It could be an alternative to kops. Source: about 2 years ago