Software Alternatives & Reviews

autosetup VS Ninja Build

Compare autosetup VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

autosetup is a tool, similar to autoconf, to configure a build system for the appropriate...

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
autosetup Landing Page
autosetup Landing Page
Ninja Build Landing Page
Ninja Build Landing Page

autosetup details

Continuous Integration Product Deployment Java Build Tools

Ninja Build details

Continuous Integration Product Deployment Java Build Tools

autosetup videos

No autosetup videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Ninja Build videos


Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autosetup and Ninja Build)

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autosetup mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autosetup yet. Tracking of autosetup recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ninja Build mentions (5)

  • Cmake alterntives
    The build can be faster if you use Ninja instead of make. Ninja was designed for speed and to have its input files be generated by programs instead of hand-written. If a project is already just using make, simply changing the generator to Ninja cmake -G Ninja will probably result in faster builds. - Source: Reddit / 26 days ago
  • Is there a statically typed functional programming language that doesn't take purity so seriously?
    * BuckleScript/ReScript works by forking the OCaml compiler and has been stuck on years-out-of-date versions of it as a result. Works well but you miss out on some nice stuff that's been done the past few years. Melange is trying to fix some of that by splitting out the compiler changes in a way that lets it keep up with recent compiler versions, plus eventually replace its odd custom Ninja-based build system... - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • How do you build your source code?
    We use ninja - a very small and fast build system. Ninja generally needs something to generate its build files (CMake, Meson, etc.), but we just use a little Python script to generate ours. - Source: Reddit / 5 months ago
  • Looking Beyond Nox
    So far, I've looked, relatively superficially, at Ninja, doit, Bazel, and SCons. It looks to me like Ninja and doit won't handle the third point above without requiring something really strange, and if Bazel or SCons documents things one way or the other, I haven't found it yet. - Source: / 6 months ago
  • Debian Running on Rust Coreutils
    There's always ninja. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autosetup and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

tup - Tup is a file-based build system for Linux, OSX, and Windows.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

waf - Waf is a Python-based framework for configuring, compiling and installing applications.

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

User reviews

Share your experience with using autosetup and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review