Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login
A

Autoconf VS Buildr

Compare Autoconf VS Buildr and see what are their differences

BoxyHQ
B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Autoconf logo Autoconf

GNU Autoconf is a tool for producing configure scripts for building, installing and packaging...

Buildr logo Buildr

Apache Buildr is a build system for Java-based applications, including support for Scala, Groovy...
  • Autoconf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15
  • Buildr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-11

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Autoconf and Buildr)

Autoconf

Buildr

Front End Package Manager
78 78%
Front End Package Manager
22% 22
JS Build Tools
77 77%
JS Build Tools
23% 23
JavaScript Package Manager
77 77%
JavaScript Package Manager
23% 23
Continuous Integration
100 100%
Continuous Integration
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Autoconf and Buildr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Autoconf and Buildr, you can also consider the following products

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

qmake - Qt 5 qmake Makefile generator tool

Loading...