Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Atlassian Fisheye VS CodeFactor.io

Compare Atlassian Fisheye VS CodeFactor.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Atlassian Fisheye logo Atlassian Fisheye

With FishEye you can search code, visualize and report on activity and find for commits, files, revisions, or teammates across SVN, Git, Mercurial, CVS and Perforce.

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
  • Atlassian Fisheye Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Atlassian Fisheye features and specs

  • Code Search
    FishEye provides advanced search capabilities, allowing users to search codebases effectively with powerful filters and syntax search options.
  • Integration with Crucible
    FishEye integrates seamlessly with Crucible, Atlassian's code review tool, making it easier to conduct code reviews and improve code quality within the same ecosystem.
  • Repository Visualization
    The tool offers visualization options to view repository activity, track changes, and understand the evolution of a project over time, aiding in project management and analysis.
  • Multiple SCM Support
    FishEye supports various source control management systems like Git, Mercurial, Subversion, CVS, and Perforce, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages of Atlassian Fisheye

  • Cost
    Compared to some open-source alternatives, FishEye can be relatively expensive, which might be a drawback for smaller teams or budget-conscious organizations.
  • Complexity
    The setup and configuration process can be complex, especially for teams unfamiliar with Atlassian products, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance slowdowns when indexing large repositories, which can affect productivity if not managed properly.
  • Limited Standalone Features
    While powerful, FishEye's full potential is often realized only when used in conjunction with other Atlassian tools, which could be limiting for users seeking a standalone solution.

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Atlassian Fisheye videos

Atlassian FishEye

More videos:

  • Review - Atlassian FishEye Overview Video

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atlassian Fisheye and CodeFactor.io)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Code Quality
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Atlassian Fisheye and CodeFactor.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Atlassian Fisheye and CodeFactor.io, you can also consider the following products

WPMU DEV - WPMU offers WordPress Plugins, WordPress Themes, WordPress Multisite and BuddyPress Plugins and Themes.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

MAMP - MAMP is the abbreviation for Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. It is a reliable application with its four components that allows you to access the local PHP server as well as the database server (SQL).

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Firefox Developer Edition - Built for those who build the Web. The only browser made for developers.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.