Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AppImageLauncher VS Pamac

Compare AppImageLauncher VS Pamac and see what are their differences

AppImageLauncher logo AppImageLauncher

Helper application for Linux distributions serving as a kind of "entry point" for running and integrating AppImages.

Pamac logo Pamac

Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).
  • AppImageLauncher Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-23
  • Pamac Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

AppImageLauncher videos

Using AppImageLauncher to Integrate AppImage Applications into your Linux distro

More videos:

  • Review - Installing AppImageLauncher on Linux || OpenSUSE Leap 15.3

Pamac videos

Install Package Manager in Arch Linux Pamac-AUR, Pamac-classic or Octopi

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppImageLauncher and Pamac)
Front End Package Manager
Work Music
0 0%
100% 100
Software Marketplace
100 100%
0% 0
Focus Music
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AppImageLauncher and Pamac. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppImageLauncher and Pamac, you can also consider the following products

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.

AppImageHub - AppImage applications for Linux without installation

paru - An AUR helper written in Rust and based on the design of yay. It aims to be your standard pacman wrapping AUR helper with minimal interaction.

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

Octopi - Powerful Pacman (GUI | frontend) written in Qt