Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apidog VS localhost.run

Compare Apidog VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apidog logo Apidog

All-in-One workspace for API Design, Documentation, Debug, Mock, Test

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • Apidog Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-03
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Apidog features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Apidog offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users, even less technical ones, to navigate and utilize its features effectively.
  • Comprehensive API Management
    It provides a full suite of tools for designing, testing, and managing APIs, which can streamline the API development process.
  • Collaboration Features
    Apidog supports team collaboration by allowing multiple users to work on API projects simultaneously, enhancing productivity and coordination.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform offers integration with various other tools and services, facilitating seamless workflows and data synchronization.

Possible disadvantages of Apidog

  • Cost
    While Apidog offers a range of features, accessing its full potential might require a subscription or payment, which could be a barrier for budget-constrained users or small businesses.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced features may require a learning curve for new users to fully utilize them.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Some users might find the limited functionality when offline to be a drawback if they require constant access to API management tools without an Internet connection.
  • Specific Use Case Limitations
    Depending on a user's specific needs, Apidog might lack certain niche features or customization options that specialized or more developer-centric tools provide.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Apidog videos

"Apidog: Streamline Your API Development with Comprehensive Tools for a Design-First Approach"

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apidog and localhost.run)
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apidog and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apidog and localhost.run

Apidog Reviews

Top 20 Open Source & Cloud Free Postman Alternatives (2024 Updated)
That’s right, APIDog gives you all the features that comes with Postman paid version, at a fraction of the cost. Migration has been so easily that you only need to click a few buttons, and APIDog will do everything for you.
Source: medium.com

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apidog mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apidog yet. Tracking of Apidog recommendations started around Dec 2022.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apidog and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

Simple API Doc - Publish your API Documentation. SimpleAPIDoc is a platform that allows you to publish your API Documentation in a simple and easy way.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Swagger Inspector - Free online tool to test APIs and autogenerate documentation

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

StopLight - Stoplight is an API Design, Development, and Documentation platform that enables consistency, reusability, and quality in your API lifecycle, all with an easy, enjoyable developer experience.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.