Apache Tika VS JavaScript Obfuscator

Apache Tika has worked well for me in the past, ended up running it on an AWS Lambda https://tika.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

If you accept running Java, the Apache Tika is extremely good at parsing content (https://tika.apache.org/). - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

Apache Tika can spit out text from lots of formats. I've used it with grep (or rg) to make a small scale searching of local folders. Tika does a really good job at OCR for finding if text is in a file. Source: about 1 year ago

Https://tika.apache.org Meta data from things. Source: about 1 year ago

At my previous job we had the same problem which we solved by using Tika. We called it on the server along with other stuff, but there is also a Python binding. Source: almost 2 years ago

I don't need/use IDA, Nemlei just used https://obfuscator.io/, which just obfuscates the crap out of the code using various known methods (which I won't go into detail, it's public knowledge) and an un-obfuscation was cooked up by others. The one fucked-up thing the website does is randomizing function names, it just changes every variable/function name. We can't "un-obfuscate" those, so it's up to our brains to... Source: 5 months ago

It's to purposefully makes your code harder to read so it prevents people from stealing your work. Here's a tool that does it: https://obfuscator.io/. Source: about 1 year ago

I just tested it on a little snippet of my code obfuscated with https://obfuscator.io/ and it worked seemingly perfectly. My original code:

  function resizeImage(img) {.

- Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Https://obfuscator.io/ produces a similar result, perhaps that's all they used. Source: over 1 year ago

The obfuscation looks very similar to what you might get from https://obfuscator.io/. Source: over 1 year ago