Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Synapse VS WebSphere Message Broker

Compare Apache Synapse VS WebSphere Message Broker and see what are their differences

Apache Synapse logo Apache Synapse

On-Premise Data Integration

WebSphere Message Broker logo WebSphere Message Broker

Enterprise Service Bus
  • Apache Synapse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • WebSphere Message Broker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-06

Apache Synapse features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Synapse is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections, making it suitable for high-load environments and scalable architectures.
  • Flexibility
    It offers a flexible system for managing web services interactions, with support for numerous protocols such as HTTP/S, JMS, and more, allowing integration with diverse systems.
  • Lightweight
    Synapse is lightweight in terms of configuration and operation, which can be an advantage in environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Synapse is freely available and benefits from community contributions and improvements.
  • Extensible
    Developers can extend its capabilities to meet specific business requirements by using custom scripts and mediators.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Synapse

  • Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Apache Synapse can be complex, requiring a deep understanding of its architecture and components, which can be a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Documentation
    Users may find the documentation lacking in certain areas, which can make troubleshooting and learning more difficult for newer users.
  • Performance Overhead
    Under certain circumstances, there might be performance overhead due to the way Synapse processes requests, which can be an issue in highly performance-sensitive applications.
  • Community Support
    While it is open-source, the community and support around Apache Synapse might not be as large or active as some other integration solutions.
  • Limited Features Compared to Competitors
    Apache Synapse might lack some advanced features present in commercial solutions, which could be a limitation for enterprise-level requirements.

WebSphere Message Broker features and specs

  • Scalability
    WebSphere Message Broker is designed to handle large volumes of data and can scale to accommodate increasing loads, making it suitable for enterprise-level integration solutions.
  • Protocol Flexibility
    It supports a wide range of protocols and message formats, allowing diverse systems to communicate seamlessly without the need for additional tools.
  • Integration Capabilities
    WebSphere Message Broker provides robust integration capabilities, enabling connection between various applications, services, and devices, effectively acting as a universal translator.
  • Reliability
    The broker ensures high reliability through its robust failover and recovery mechanisms, which minimize downtime and data loss in case of failures.
  • Comprehensive Tooling
    Offers a suite of development tools that streamline the creation, testing, and deployment of message flows, reducing the time and effort required for integration projects.

Possible disadvantages of WebSphere Message Broker

  • Complexity
    The platform's extensive features and capabilities can lead to a steep learning curve and require significant expertise to manage efficiently.
  • Cost
    Licensing and operational costs can be high, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations or projects with limited budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    WebSphere Message Broker can consume substantial system resources, necessitating powerful infrastructure to operate effectively, especially in high-volume scenarios.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    As a proprietary IBM product, organizations may encounter challenges or increased costs when trying to switch to other integration solutions.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source alternatives, WebSphere Message Broker has a smaller community, which can limit the availability of community-driven resources and support.

Apache Synapse videos

API Facade Pattern with Apache Synapse

WebSphere Message Broker videos

Best Practices for Managing and Monitoring WebSphere Message Broker

More videos:

  • Review - IBM Integration Bus Online Training | IBM Websphere Message Broker Course & Certification
  • Tutorial - IBM Integration Bus Tutorials for beginners | IIB | IBM Websphere Message Broker Course | Kasha

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Synapse and WebSphere Message Broker)
Web Service Automation
77 77%
23% 23
Data Integration
77 77%
23% 23
ETL
74 74%
26% 26
Open Source
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Synapse and WebSphere Message Broker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Synapse and WebSphere Message Broker, you can also consider the following products

Apache Camel - Apache Camel is a versatile open-source integration framework based on known enterprise integration patterns.

Azure Service Bus - Learn how to set up messaging that connects applications and services across on-premises and cloud environments. Tutorials, videos, API references, and more.

IBM App Connect - IBM App Connect is the all-in-one integration tool for connecting apps, integrating data, building APIs and acting on events

Software AG webMethods - Software AG’s webMethods enables you to quickly integrate systems, partners, data, devices and SaaS applications

Peregrine Connect - The only enterprise integration product built on Microsoft .NET. Peregrine enables you to quickly and easily connect your line-of-business systems.

Talend Application Integration - Build a SOA based on microservices to connect and manage in real-time without coding. Compare Talend's application integration products.