Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Synapse VS Beats

Compare Apache Synapse VS Beats and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Synapse logo Apache Synapse

On-Premise Data Integration

Beats logo Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers that is installed as lightweight agents and send data to machines to Logstash or Elasticsearch.
  • Apache Synapse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • Beats Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

Apache Synapse features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Synapse is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections, making it suitable for high-load environments and scalable architectures.
  • Flexibility
    It offers a flexible system for managing web services interactions, with support for numerous protocols such as HTTP/S, JMS, and more, allowing integration with diverse systems.
  • Lightweight
    Synapse is lightweight in terms of configuration and operation, which can be an advantage in environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Synapse is freely available and benefits from community contributions and improvements.
  • Extensible
    Developers can extend its capabilities to meet specific business requirements by using custom scripts and mediators.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Synapse

  • Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Apache Synapse can be complex, requiring a deep understanding of its architecture and components, which can be a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Documentation
    Users may find the documentation lacking in certain areas, which can make troubleshooting and learning more difficult for newer users.
  • Performance Overhead
    Under certain circumstances, there might be performance overhead due to the way Synapse processes requests, which can be an issue in highly performance-sensitive applications.
  • Community Support
    While it is open-source, the community and support around Apache Synapse might not be as large or active as some other integration solutions.
  • Limited Features Compared to Competitors
    Apache Synapse might lack some advanced features present in commercial solutions, which could be a limitation for enterprise-level requirements.

Beats features and specs

  • Lightweight Agents
    Beats are designed to be lightweight, which allows them to easily run on edge devices without significantly impacting system performance.
  • Eclectic Set of Data Shippers
    Beats offers a range of specialized shippers like Filebeat, Metricbeat, Packetbeat, and others, each tailored for different types of data collection, ensuring flexibility and efficiency.
  • Easy Integration with Elastic Stack
    Beats seamlessly integrates with other components of the Elastic Stack, like Elasticsearch and Kibana, providing a unified data collection and analysis ecosystem.
  • Extensible and Open Source
    Being open-source, Beats can be extended and customized to meet specific needs, allowing users to modify or enhance functionalities.
  • Community and Support
    Beats has a strong community and offers extensive documentation, which aids in troubleshooting and enhancing user knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Beats

  • Limited Processing Capabilities
    Beats is designed primarily for data shipment and lacks powerful processing capabilities, which may necessitate additional processing tools like Logstash.
  • Complexity with Scale
    Managing many Beats agents across a large infrastructure can become complex, requiring orchestrations and management strategies to avoid configuration drifts.
  • Memory Consumption
    While lightweight, some Beats can still consume a notable amount of memory, particularly when processing large datasets or complex configurations.
  • Learning Curve
    For users not familiar with the Elastic Stack ecosystem, there might be a learning curve in configuring and optimizing Beats for specific use cases.

Apache Synapse videos

API Facade Pattern with Apache Synapse

Beats videos

Beats Solo Pro: Return to Excellence!

More videos:

  • Review - The Beats Solo Pro Are The Best Beats Yet
  • Review - Beats Studio 3 Wireless "Real Review"

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Synapse and Beats)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Synapse and Beats. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Synapse and Beats, you can also consider the following products

Apache Camel - Apache Camel is a versatile open-source integration framework based on known enterprise integration patterns.

Wazuh - Open Source Host and Endpoint Security

Azure Service Bus - Learn how to set up messaging that connects applications and services across on-premises and cloud environments. Tutorials, videos, API references, and more.

Riemann - Container Monitoring

Software AG webMethods - Software AG’s webMethods enables you to quickly integrate systems, partners, data, devices and SaaS applications

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer - Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is a powerful product for Security Fabric Analytics and Automation.