Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Synapse VS Azure Service Bus

Compare Apache Synapse VS Azure Service Bus and see what are their differences

Apache Synapse logo Apache Synapse

On-Premise Data Integration

Azure Service Bus logo Azure Service Bus

Learn how to set up messaging that connects applications and services across on-premises and cloud environments. Tutorials, videos, API references, and more.
  • Apache Synapse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • Azure Service Bus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

Apache Synapse features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Synapse is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections, making it suitable for high-load environments and scalable architectures.
  • Flexibility
    It offers a flexible system for managing web services interactions, with support for numerous protocols such as HTTP/S, JMS, and more, allowing integration with diverse systems.
  • Lightweight
    Synapse is lightweight in terms of configuration and operation, which can be an advantage in environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Synapse is freely available and benefits from community contributions and improvements.
  • Extensible
    Developers can extend its capabilities to meet specific business requirements by using custom scripts and mediators.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Synapse

  • Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Apache Synapse can be complex, requiring a deep understanding of its architecture and components, which can be a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Documentation
    Users may find the documentation lacking in certain areas, which can make troubleshooting and learning more difficult for newer users.
  • Performance Overhead
    Under certain circumstances, there might be performance overhead due to the way Synapse processes requests, which can be an issue in highly performance-sensitive applications.
  • Community Support
    While it is open-source, the community and support around Apache Synapse might not be as large or active as some other integration solutions.
  • Limited Features Compared to Competitors
    Apache Synapse might lack some advanced features present in commercial solutions, which could be a limitation for enterprise-level requirements.

Azure Service Bus features and specs

  • Reliable Messaging
    Azure Service Bus ensures reliable message delivery through features like message duplication detection, message sessions, and dead-letter queues, providing robust and durable message handling.
  • Scalability
    Service Bus is designed to handle high-throughput scenarios, making it suitable for applications that require scalable messaging across various workloads.
  • Message Security
    Service Bus provides secure messaging with options for transporting data over SSL and authorization mechanisms such as Shared Access Signature (SAS) and Azure Active Directory (AAD) integration.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Azure services and on-premises solutions, offering hybrid connections and seamless interaction with Azure Logic Apps, Azure Functions, and more.
  • Advanced Messaging Patterns
    Supports a variety of messaging patterns, including pub/sub and message sessions, which allow for complex workflows and inter-process communication.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Service Bus

  • Cost
    Depending on usage, costs can escalate, especially in scenarios requiring high throughput or long message retention, making budget management important.
  • Complexity
    Implementing and managing Service Bus can require significant understanding and expertise, particularly when dealing with advanced features like message sessions and transaction support.
  • Latency
    While generally fast, there can be latency issues depending on the configuration and geographical distribution of resources, impacting real-time applications.
  • Message Size Limit
    Service Bus imposes a size limit on messages (up to 256 KB for standard and 1 MB for premium), requiring message batching or segmentation for larger payloads.
  • Dependency on Azure
    As a fully managed service in Azure, uptime and performance depend heavily on Azure's reliability, which can be a concern for some critical applications.

Apache Synapse videos

API Facade Pattern with Apache Synapse

Azure Service Bus videos

Understanding Azure Events and Messages: Azure Service Bus, Event Grids and Event Hubs

More videos:

  • Review - Day 25 - Azure Service Bus

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Synapse and Azure Service Bus)
Web Service Automation
43 43%
57% 57
Data Integration
43 43%
57% 57
ETL
44 44%
56% 56
Open Source
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Synapse and Azure Service Bus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Synapse and Azure Service Bus, you can also consider the following products

Apache Camel - Apache Camel is a versatile open-source integration framework based on known enterprise integration patterns.

Software AG webMethods - Software AG’s webMethods enables you to quickly integrate systems, partners, data, devices and SaaS applications

IBM App Connect - IBM App Connect is the all-in-one integration tool for connecting apps, integrating data, building APIs and acting on events

Peregrine Connect - The only enterprise integration product built on Microsoft .NET. Peregrine enables you to quickly and easily connect your line-of-business systems.

Talend Application Integration - Build a SOA based on microservices to connect and manage in real-time without coding. Compare Talend's application integration products.

WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus - WSO2 ESB enables enterprises to be more agile in delivering new digital products and services, both internally as well as across digital ecosystems.