Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache OpenOffice Base VS Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Compare Apache OpenOffice Base VS Microsoft SQL Server Compact and see what are their differences

Apache OpenOffice Base logo Apache OpenOffice Base

Base, part of the https://alternativeto.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact logo Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.
  • Apache OpenOffice Base Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17
  • Microsoft SQL Server Compact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26

Apache OpenOffice Base features and specs

  • Cost
    Apache OpenOffice Base is free to use and distribute, making it an attractive option for individuals and organizations seeking cost-effective database solutions.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source software, it allows users to modify and enhance the application according to their needs, and benefit from community contributions.
  • Integration with OpenOffice Suite
    It integrates seamlessly with other Apache OpenOffice applications like Writer, Calc, and Impress, enabling easier data handling and analysis across different types of documents.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Base runs on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing flexibility and consistency in different environments.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The interface is relatively intuitive and user-friendly, which helps in reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of Apache OpenOffice Base

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more advanced database solutions like Microsoft Access or SQL-based services, Base lacks some advanced features and functionalities.
  • Performance Issues
    For large datasets or complex queries, performance can be slower compared to more robust, specialized database management systems.
  • Compatibility
    There might be compatibility issues when working with proprietary databases or more widespread database formats, requiring additional steps or software to bridge the gap.
  • Support and Documentation
    While there is a community support system, it may not be as comprehensive or fast as those provided by commercial database applications.
  • User Interface Updates
    The user interface and overall design might feel outdated compared to modern software, potentially impacting user experience.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact features and specs

  • Lightweight and Portable
    Microsoft SQL Server Compact is a lightweight database solution that can be easily deployed with applications, making it ideal for desktop, mobile, and small-scale web applications.
  • In-Process Database Engine
    The database engine runs within the application process, which eliminates the need for a separate server, reducing system complexity and resource usage.
  • Zero-configuration Needed
    SQL Server Compact requires no installation or configuration, which simplifies deployment for developers and end users alike.
  • Free to Use
    It is free, which makes it a cost-effective solution for small projects or for inclusion in commercial and non-commercial applications.
  • Integration with Visual Studio
    Offers seamless integration with Microsoft Visual Studio, providing an easy-to-use development experience for .NET developers.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL Server Compact

  • Limited Features
    It lacks some advanced features found in other editions of SQL Server, such as stored procedures, triggers, and advanced security features, which may be necessary for more complex applications.
  • Not Suitable for Large Applications
    Designed for smaller, single-user applications, SQL Server Compact is not suitable for large, multi-user, or distributed database scenarios.
  • End of Life Considerations
    With advancements in other Microsoft data solutions and no major updates being released for SQL Server Compact, developers may need to consider future migration strategies.
  • Limited Storage Capacity
    The maximum database size is constrained, limiting its ability to handle extensive data storage needs.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Being an older technology, it might face compatibility issues with newer technologies and platforms.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache OpenOffice Base and Microsoft SQL Server Compact)
Databases
52 52%
48% 48
NoSQL Databases
46 46%
54% 54
Development
49 49%
51% 51
Key-Value Database
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache OpenOffice Base and Microsoft SQL Server Compact. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache OpenOffice Base and Microsoft SQL Server Compact, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft Office Access - Access is now much more than a way to create desktop databases. It’s an easy-to-use tool for quickly creating browser-based database applications.

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

LibreOffice - Base - Base, database, database frontend, LibreOffice, ODF, Open Standards, SQL, ODBC

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.