Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Ignite VS UnQLite

Compare Apache Ignite VS UnQLite and see what are their differences

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

UnQLite logo UnQLite

UnQLite is a in-process software library which implements a self-contained, serverless...
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08
  • UnQLite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-01-02

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

UnQLite features and specs

  • Lightweight
    UnQLite is an embedded NoSQL database engine designed to be lightweight, making it ideal for applications with limited resources or those that require a simple, efficient database solution.
  • Single File Storage
    The entire database is stored in a single file, which simplifies deployment and management, and reduces the overhead associated with multiple files.
  • Zero Configuration
    UnQLite requires no configuration, allowing developers to easily integrate it into their applications without having to deal with complex setup procedures.
  • Embedded JSON Document Store
    It includes a built-in JSON document store which allows for storing and querying JSON documents efficiently, making it suitable for a variety of applications, especially those that handle JSON data.
  • Support for Key/Value Storage
    UnQLite supports key/value storage, providing flexibility in data modeling by allowing developers to choose between a document-oriented or a key/value store.
  • Cross-Platform
    UnQLite can be used across different operating systems, offering the flexibility to develop applications in a variety of environments.

Possible disadvantages of UnQLite

  • Limited Scalability
    UnQLite, being an embedded database, may not scale well for extremely large datasets or highly concurrent environments compared to other distributed database systems.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    UnQLite lacks some advanced database features found in other DBMS such as complex transactions, extensive query capabilities, and built-in replication.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    The community and ecosystem around UnQLite are not as large or active as those around more popular databases, which might limit the availability of third-party tools and resources.
  • Limited Documentation
    While UnQLite has basic documentation, it may not be as comprehensive as that of other more established database systems, potentially hindering new users.
  • SQL Incompatibility
    Unlike SQL databases, UnQLite uses its own query language, which might be unfamiliar to developers accustomed to SQL, requiring additional learning and adjustments.

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

UnQLite videos

No UnQLite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Ignite and UnQLite)
Databases
61 61%
39% 39
NoSQL Databases
58 58%
42% 42
Key-Value Database
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Ignite and UnQLite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Ignite should be more popular than UnQLite. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

UnQLite mentions (1)

  • SQLite NOSQL Alternatives
    Unqlite is probably the closest nosql equivalent to SQLite that I can think of. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Ignite and UnQLite, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact - Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

VoltDB - In-memory relational DBMS capable of supporting millions of database operations per second