Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Ignite VS Azure Stream Analytics

Compare Apache Ignite VS Azure Stream Analytics and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

Azure Stream Analytics logo Azure Stream Analytics

Azure Stream Analytics offers real-time stream processing in the cloud.
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08
  • Azure Stream Analytics Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-21

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

Azure Stream Analytics features and specs

  • Real-time Data Processing
    Azure Stream Analytics allows for real-time data processing, which enables businesses to analyze and process data as it is generated to make faster decisions.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform provides a simple and intuitive interface for setting up streaming jobs, making it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Scalability
    It is designed to handle large volumes of data, allowing for automatic scaling to accommodate more data without compromising performance.
  • Integration with Azure Ecosystem
    Seamless integration with other Azure services like Azure Functions, Azure Event Hubs, and Azure Blob Storage allows for a unified cloud ecosystem.
  • Cost Efficiency
    Its pricing model based on the volume of data processed makes it cost-efficient, especially for projects that require variable or burst data processing.
  • Support for Multiple Input Sources
    It supports multiple input sources such as IoT Hub, Event Hub, and Azure Blob Storage, providing flexibility in designing the data flow architecture.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Stream Analytics

  • Limited Machine Learning Capabilities
    Azure Stream Analytics has limited built-in capabilities for complex machine learning models, requiring integration with other services for advanced analytics.
  • Complex Queries
    While powerful, the query language can be complex for users unfamiliar with SQL, potentially necessitating a learning curve for new users.
  • Geographic Availability
    Not all features are available in every Azure region, which may limit its usability for some global operations depending on the region's support.
  • Debugging and Monitoring
    Some users have reported that debugging and monitoring issues can be challenging due to limited tools compared to other more mature data processing platforms.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    As a cloud-based service, it requires reliable internet connectivity, which can be a constraint for operations in environments with unstable connections.

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Azure Stream Analytics videos

Azure Stream Analytics

More videos:

  • Review - Real-time Analytics with Azure Stream Analytics
  • Demo - Introduction to Azure Stream Analytics + Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Ignite and Azure Stream Analytics)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Data Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Ignite and Azure Stream Analytics. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Ignite seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

Azure Stream Analytics mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Azure Stream Analytics yet. Tracking of Azure Stream Analytics recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Ignite and Azure Stream Analytics, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Apache Flink - Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

PieSync - Seamless two-way sync between your CRM, marketing apps and Google in no time