HBase and Cassandra: Both cater to non-structured Big Data. Cassandra is geared towards scenarios requiring high availability with eventual consistency, while HBase offers strong consistency and is better suited for read-heavy applications where data consistency is paramount. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

NoSQL databases are non-relational databases with flexible schema designed for high performance at a massive scale. Unlike traditional relational databases, which use tables and predefined schemas, NoSQL databases use a variety of data models. There are 4 main types of NoSQL databases - document, graph, key-value, and column-oriented databases. NoSQL databases generally are well-suited for unstructured data,... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

HBase, A scalable, distributed database that supports structured data storage for large tables. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Today, it is normal for enterprises to leverage diversified databases. In my market of expertise, China, in the Internet industry, MySQL together with data sharding middleware is the go to architecture, with GreenPlum, HBase, Elasticsearch, Clickhouse and other big data ecosystems being auxiliary computing engine for analytical data. At the same time, some legacy systems (such as SQLServer legacy from .NET... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

For this type of systems PostgreSQL not best solution, and for a number of reasons like lack of replication out of the box. And we strictly must not have «Vendor lock», and therefore also did not take modern SQL databases like Amazon Aurora. And end of the ends the choice was made in favor Cassandra, for this article where we will talking about low-lever implementation of Repository Pattern it is not important, in... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

As far as keeping track of domain changes you can store DDL files in version control like you mention or use tools like Flyway (https://flywaydb.org) or Liquidbase (https://liquibase.org) which takes care of database migrations. Source: about 2 years ago

I just use SQL directly (or something like JOOQ). For database migrations I use Liquibase. Source: about 2 years ago

Regarding the migrations, there are tools such as https://liquibase.org/ or FlyAway that handle this. Heck, you can even use an ORM that has a migration baked-in but that defeats the purpose of having the migrations in a separate project. Source: about 2 years ago

I've trialled schemachange and liquibase which are change script based tools. I've ruled out a whole load of other tools that are either change script based tools or don't support Snowflake, including the following:. Source: over 2 years ago

Nowadays I prefer to automate database updates and deployment, using Liquibase and its relational database vendor agnostic syntax for that. Especially on production systems. But on local dev environments, I can still use the occasional SQL in a pinch. Source: over 2 years ago