Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache Camel VS Sidekiq

Compare Apache Camel VS Sidekiq and see what are their differences

Apache Camel logo Apache Camel

Apache Camel is a versatile open-source integration framework based on known enterprise integration patterns.

Sidekiq logo Sidekiq

Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby
  • Apache Camel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-14
  • Sidekiq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-28

Apache Camel videos

No Apache Camel videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Sidekiq videos

Sidekiq Review: Influencer Marketing Software (Platform)

More videos:

  • Review - Mike Perham, Creator of Sidekiq
  • Review - RailsConf 2015 - Processes and Threads - Resque vs. Sidekiq

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Camel and Sidekiq)
Data Integration
81 81%
19% 19
Ruby On Rails
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
0% 0
ETL
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Camel and Sidekiq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Camel and Sidekiq

Apache Camel Reviews

10 Best Open Source ETL Tools for Data Integration
Popular for its data integration capabilities, Apache Camel supports most of the Enterprise Integration Patterns and newer integration patterns from microservice architectures. The idea is to help you solve your business integration problems using the best industry practices. It is also interesting to note that the tool runs standalone and is embeddable as a library within...
Source: testsigma.com
11 Best FREE Open-Source ETL Tools in 2024
Apache Camel is an Open-Source framework that helps you integrate different applications using multiple protocols and technologies. It helps configure routing and mediation rules by providing a Java-object-based implementation of Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP), declarative Java-domain specific language, or by using an API.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 10 Popular Open-Source ETL Tools for 2021
Apache Camel is an Open-Source framework that helps you integrate different applications using multiple protocols and technologies. It helps configure routing and mediation rules by providing a Java-object-based implementation of Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP), declarative Java-domain specific language, or by using an API.
Source: hevodata.com
Top ETL Tools For 2021...And The Case For Saying "No" To ETL
Apache Camel uses Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), a naming scheme used in Camel to refer to an endpoint that provides information such as which components are being used, the context path and the options applied against the component. There are more than 100 components used by Apache Camel, including FTP, JMX and HTTP. Apache Camel can be deployed as a standalone...
Source: blog.panoply.io

Sidekiq Reviews

We have no reviews of Sidekiq yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sidekiq should be more popular than Apache Camel. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Camel mentions (12)

  • Ask HN: What is the correct way to deal with pipelines?
    "correct" is a value judgement that depends on lots of different things. Only you can decide which tool is correct. Here are some ideas: - https://camel.apache.org/ - https://www.windmill.dev/ Your idea about a queue (in redis, or postgres, or sqlite, etc) is also totally valid. These off-the-shelf tools I listed probably wouldn't give you a huge advantage IMO. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Why messaging is much better than REST for inter-microservice communications
    This reminds me more of Apache Camel[0] than other things it's being compared to. > The process initiator puts a message on a queue, and another processor picks that up (probably on a different service, on a different host, and in different code base) - does some processing, and puts its (intermediate) result on another queue This is almost exactly the definition of message routing (ie: Camel). I'm a bit doubtful... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Can I continuously write to a CSV file with a python script while a Java application is continuously reading from it?
    Since you're writing a Java app to consume this, I highly recommend Apache Camel to do the consuming of messages for it. You can trivially aim it at file systems, message queues, databases, web services and all manner of other sources to grab your data for you, and you can change your mind about what that source is, without having to rewrite most of your client code. Source: over 1 year ago
  • S3 to S3 transform
    For a simple sequential Pipeline, my goto would be Apache Camel. As soon as you want complexity its either Apache Nifi or a micro service architecture. Source: over 1 year ago
  • 🗞️ We have just released our JBang! catalog 🛍️
    🐪 Apache Camel : Camel JBang, A JBang-based Camel app for easily running Camel routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Sidekiq mentions (20)

  • 3 one-person million dollar online businesses
    Sidekiq https://sidekiq.org/: This one started as an open source project, once it got enough traction, the developer made a premium version of it, and makes money by selling licenses to businesses. Source: 5 months ago
  • We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
    > I'm not sure feature withholding has traditionally worked out well in the developer space. I think it's worked out well for Sidekiq (https://sidekiq.org). I really like their model of layering valuable features between the OSS / Pro / Enterprise licenses. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Organize Business Logic in Your Ruby on Rails Application
    The code above isn't idempotent. If you run it twice, it will create two copies, which is probably not what you intended. Why is this important? Because most backend job processors like Sidekiq don't make any guarantees that your jobs will run exactly once. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • An M1 for Curl
    Relevant Patio11 comment from 2016: > We don't donate to OSS software which we use, because we're legally not allowed to. > I routinely send key projects, particularly smaller projects, a request to quote me a commercial license of their project, with the explanation that I would accept a quote of $1,000 and that the commercial license can be their existing OSS license plus an invoice. My books suggest we've spent... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How to run a really long task from a Rails web request
    So how do we trigger such a long-running process from a Rails request? The first option that comes to mind is a background job run by some of the queuing back-ends such as Sidekiq, Resque or DelayedJob, possibly governed by ActiveJob. While this would surely work, the problem with all these solutions is that they usually have a limited number of workers available on the server and we didn’t want to potentially... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Camel and Sidekiq, you can also consider the following products

Histats - Start tracking your visitors in 1 minute!

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

StatCounter - StatCounter is a simple but powerful real-time web analytics service that helps you track, analyse and understand your visitors so you can make good decisions to become more successful online.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

AFSAnalytics - AFSAnalytics.

delayed_job - Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job