Based on our record, Apache Camel should be more popular than Apache ActiveMQ. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
"correct" is a value judgement that depends on lots of different things. Only you can decide which tool is correct. Here are some ideas: - https://camel.apache.org/ - https://www.windmill.dev/ Your idea about a queue (in redis, or postgres, or sqlite, etc) is also totally valid. These off-the-shelf tools I listed probably wouldn't give you a huge advantage IMO. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
This reminds me more of Apache Camel[0] than other things it's being compared to. > The process initiator puts a message on a queue, and another processor picks that up (probably on a different service, on a different host, and in different code base) - does some processing, and puts its (intermediate) result on another queue This is almost exactly the definition of message routing (ie: Camel). I'm a bit doubtful... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Since you're writing a Java app to consume this, I highly recommend Apache Camel to do the consuming of messages for it. You can trivially aim it at file systems, message queues, databases, web services and all manner of other sources to grab your data for you, and you can change your mind about what that source is, without having to rewrite most of your client code. Source: about 1 year ago
For a simple sequential Pipeline, my goto would be Apache Camel. As soon as you want complexity its either Apache Nifi or a micro service architecture. Source: over 1 year ago
🐪 Apache Camel : Camel JBang, A JBang-based Camel app for easily running Camel routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Apache ActiveMQ is an open-source Java-based message queue that can be accessed by clients written in Javascript, C, C++, Python and .NET. There are two versions of ActiveMQ, the existing “classic” version and the next generation “Artemis” version, which is currently being worked on. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
For real-time streaming, we have other frameworks and tools like Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, and AWS Kinesis. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
The back-end is designed as a set of microservices communicating through a message broker, ActiveMQ, with a custom configuration to support delayed delivery and other features. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
My suggestion would be: don't try to reinvent the wheel. There are communications solutions out there already intended for this kind of use case, like https://activemq.apache.org/ (I point this out because Amazon MQ is based on ActiveMQ). Source: almost 2 years ago
First we have to run a broker in my case I use activeMq You can download the file zip and after extract the file you can acces to the bin foler and run. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Histats - Start tracking your visitors in 1 minute!
RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
StatCounter - StatCounter is a simple but powerful real-time web analytics service that helps you track, analyse and understand your visitors so you can make good decisions to become more successful online.
Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.
AFSAnalytics - AFSAnalytics.
IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.