Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Archiva VS HTTP

Compare Apache Archiva VS HTTP and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Archiva logo Apache Archiva

Apache Archiva is an extensible repository management software.

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.
  • Apache Archiva Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-29
  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

Apache Archiva features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache Archiva is open source software, which means it's free to use and has a community of developers contributing to its improvement.
  • Centralized Repository Management
    Archiva provides a centralized system for managing and serving artifacts, simplifying the distribution of build artifacts within an organization.
  • Support for Multiple Repository Formats
    It supports multiple repository formats such as Maven, and others, allowing versatility in handling different types of artifacts.
  • Extensive REST API
    Archiva includes a comprehensive REST API, facilitating integration with other tools and automation of repository management tasks.
  • User Management and Role-Based Access Control
    It offers a user management system with role-based access control, enhancing security and enabling the definition of user permissions.
  • Artifact Search Feature
    Archiva provides a powerful search feature that helps users quickly find the artifacts they need.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Archiva

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of Apache Archiva can be complex and time-consuming, especially for those not familiar with similar tools.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance issues when handling large amounts of artifacts or under heavy load.
  • Limited Documentation
    While basic documentation is available, it can sometimes be lacking in depth, making troubleshooting and advanced setups challenging.
  • Less Active Development
    Compared to other repository management tools, Apache Archiva may have less frequent updates and a smaller community, sometimes leading to slower adoption of new features.
  • Interface Usability
    The user interface, while functional, may not be as intuitive or modern compared to some other repository management solutions.

HTTP features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Archiva videos

How to install and configure apache archiva in AWS EC2

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Archiva new UI Quick start

HTTP videos

No HTTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Archiva and HTTP)
Customer Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Security
0 0%
100% 100
Marketing Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Browsers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Archiva and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Archiva and HTTP

Apache Archiva Reviews

Repository Management Tools
Archiva, yet another tool from the Apache family of software offerings – It is an extensible Repository management software that provides its help in taking care of the enterprise-wide build artifact repository. An incoming request with a virtual repository or a repository group URL – Archiva would look for the requested artifact from the repositories under that specific...
Source: mindmajix.com
What is Artifactory?
Archiva is an extensible repository management program that assists in the management of the enterprise-wide build artifact repository. It is another product from the Apache family of software solutions. An incoming request containing a virtual repository or a repository group URL would cause Archiva to search the repositories under that group for the requested artifact....

HTTP Reviews

We have no reviews of HTTP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Archiva mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Archiva yet. Tracking of Apache Archiva recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HTTP mentions (8)

  • State management in Svelte apps
    HTTP was invented as a stateless protocol, which means that each request fully encapsulates all of the information necessary to return a correct response. So historically, web pages never had to worry about managing state - each request to a URL with parameters or with a form submission would receive a response with all of the HTML that the browser needed to render content. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 3 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Archiva and HTTP, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tika - Apache Tika toolkit detects and extracts metadata and text from different file types.

Dat - Real-time replication and versioning for data sets

Asklayer - Get real answers from your customers with Asklayers surveys, quizzes, polls and more. Works on any website with zero code and includes enterprise level features such auto-segmentation, user tagging, branching, NPS & CSAT calculation.

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

highlight.js - Highlight.js is a syntax highlighter written in JavaScript. It works in the browser as well as on the server.

Beaker browser - Beaker is a browser for IPFS and Dat.